Comments on Lancaster BNP: Church of England, or Church of intimidation?

Why are you against the church your a bloody warlo...

2009-02-22T01:28:00.000Z

Why are you against the church your a bloody warlock .

I've rejected another advertisement (single link w...

2009-02-21T00:49:00.000Z

I've rejected another advertisement (single link with no comment) from an anonymous poster.

However this time the youtube link, in question, was indeed a very interesting video. I will be please to allow this posting if it includes a short comment about the video, from the poster. Also can I ask you why you posted this anonymously? It's a good video, from an ex Canadian prime minister, and you should have no qualms about being associated with it.

If you care about our nations future stand up to be counted!

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

Dear Anonymous (3:42 PM)I'm afraid I still have no...

2009-02-20T15:49:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (3:42 PM)

I'm afraid I still have no idea what you're talking about.

Also why have you now started to use the name Linda, whereas on previous postings you were calling yourself Rodger?

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

When will tom linden be holding the reble meeting ...

2009-02-20T15:42:00.000Z

When will tom linden be holding the reble meeting please. you must know the date Chris. Linda

Dear Anonymous (12:08 PM)What venue? Chris Hill...

2009-02-19T12:23:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (12:08 PM)

What venue?
Chris Hill (Lancaster)

Chris will you be speaking at the venue?

2009-02-19T12:08:00.000Z

Chris will you be speaking at the venue?

Has the new President of the REBLES TOM LINDEN ono...

2009-02-15T17:21:00.000Z

Has the new President of the REBLES TOM LINDEN onounced when the first meeting will be. I need to attend.

Roger

Chris except i have a certain amount of respect fo...

2009-02-14T01:55:00.000Z

Chris except i have a certain amount of respect for you,just open the link ,copy the page and try and send the page to John Oddy .The rest will follow simple try it !http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html!!

Dear Anonymous (1:44 AM),You said:CARE TO MAKE A W...

2009-02-14T01:51:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (1:44 AM),

You said:
CARE TO MAKE A WAGER!!!

I say:
I wager with whom, and about what?

From
Chris Hill

CHRIS its simple open this link copy the page then...

2009-02-14T01:50:00.000Z

CHRIS its simple open this link copy the page then try and send it to John Oddy http://www.payvand.com/news/09/feb/1141.html.

Dear Anonymous (1:32 AM),Your posting makes no sen...

2009-02-14T01:46:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (1:32 AM),

Your posting makes no sense, but please feel free to call me anytime.

From
Chris Hill
6 Thirlmere Court
Lancaster LA1 3LQ
Tel no: 07870726820
email: chris@chrishilll.freeserve.co.uk

CARE TO MAKE A WAGER!!!

2009-02-14T01:44:00.000Z

CARE TO MAKE A WAGER!!!

OPEN THIS LINK, THEN COPY THE PAGE AND SEND TO JOH...

2009-02-14T01:42:00.000Z

OPEN THIS LINK, THEN COPY THE PAGE AND SEND TO JOHN ODDY FOR EXAMPLE IT WONT BE GOING ANY PLACE TRY IT!!! (READ WHAT THE POP UP WILL SAY,I REST MY EVIDENCE.

I JEST YOU NOT!!!

2009-02-14T01:37:00.000Z

I JEST YOU NOT!!!

Not at all just open the link ,copy the page, and...

2009-02-14T01:32:00.000Z

Not at all just open the link ,copy the page, and try and send try John Oddy a pop up will appear and explain all.(I will ring you at a later date if thats ok)

Dear Anonymous (12:32 AM)No I wasn't aware of it, ...

2009-02-14T01:24:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (12:32 AM)

No I wasn't aware of it, simply because it's not true. I do reject long boring cut and paste postings, simply because these are not legitimate comments. I also reject web links that do not support a legitimate comment (ie they're nothing more than advertising). I give identifiable sources far more leeway than anonymous (gutless) posters. I regard the purpose of the comment section to be to add to the current article which it's associated with (although I do give some leeway to comments from identifiable sources). As for rejecting comments that are about Jews, try me! Put your name to a comment (I will of course have to be able to verify the name) and post it.

From
Chris Hill
6 Thirlmere Court
Lancaster LA1 3LQ
Tel no: 07870726820
email: chris@chrishilll.freeserve.co.uk

Are you aware Chris your site is being CENSORED! f...

2009-02-14T00:32:00.000Z

Are you aware Chris your site is being CENSORED! for the use of the J-- word.(Remember those you can NOT speak about have the POWER ,try and send a blog comment using the J-- word)

Dear anonymous (2:08 PM)Not as far as I know, alth...

2009-02-13T14:21:00.001Z

Dear anonymous (2:08 PM)

Not as far as I know, although if it is true I think it’s a good move. Tom is a very capable organiser and he would provide sound leadership for the VofC group.

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)

Dear anonymous (2:08 PM)Not as far as I know, alth...

2009-02-13T14:21:00.000Z

Is it true Tom Linden has taken over the REBLE GRO...

2009-02-13T14:08:00.000Z

Is it true Tom Linden has taken over the REBLE GROUP?

"OBJECTIONS WELCOME"Licence to spy on drinkersThe ...

2009-02-13T02:06:00.000Z

"OBJECTIONS WELCOME"

Licence to spy on drinkersThe police are forcing publicans to install CCTV before approving their licences

On Monday the Guardian carried a letter from Nick Gibson who told how he had taken over a pub in Islington, London, and had to apply for a new licence, which required the approval of a number of organisations, including the police.

"I was stunned," he wrote, "to find that the police were prepared to approve – ie not fight – our licence on condition that we installed CCTV capturing the head and shoulders of everyone coming into the pub, to be made available to them on request."

He wrote to his MP, Emily Thornberry, but got no reply until today when she sent a letter to the Guardian – a somewhat patronising note, suggesting that this was indeed a civil liberties issue and that the staff from the nearby local Labour headquarters should be able to come and go "without being stolen from and intimidated". She also used the opportunity to take a swipe at the local Liberal Democrat council, which has refused to install street CCTV in Islington.

Typically for a Labour MP, she did not answer the substance of Gibson's complaint, which is that there seems to exist an unofficial policy of forcing pub licencees to install CCTV. In effect, Gibson had been compelled to go along with the policy at his pub – the Drapers Arms – to keep making a living. "When was it that the constant small erosion of our liberties became irreversible?" he asked.

It is clear that the police do indeed have an unofficial policy that they implement in a thoroughly undemocratic manner when advising on licence applications – not on the merits of the case but on the applicant's compliance with their policy.

I contacted the Metropolitan Police Service and asked what was going on. Their statement read as follows:

The MPS overall does not have a policy of insisting CCTV is installed within licensed premises before supporting licence applications. However, individual boroughs may impose blanket rules in support of their objectives to prevent crime and disorder and to assist the investigation of offences when they do occur. Islington is one of the most densely populated districts for licensed premises in London and the borough's licensing authority is committed to providing a safe environment in which to socialise.

Islington council has suggested that Gibson can withdraw his application, take away the CCTV cameras and apply again for the licence. A sensible council would of course waive the need for this absurd procedure, and at the same time publicly state that it will stand against the surveillance creep that is blighting every city centre in Britain. CCTV has its purposes but the idea that someone going for a pint must give up their privacy by having their image taken and stored is repellent to all notions of a free society.

Gibson has been put in a difficult position and I would expect the council to make the first move to resolve what is a minor but also crucial issue of privacy, which of course is guaranteed to each one of us by the Human Rights Act.

If it fails to do so, he might like to provide a mask at the entrances to his pub with a suggestion that if people want to drink in private they hold up the mask as they pass the cameras. Or possibly drinkers may like to go equipped with their own mask. A V for Vendetta mask seems appropriate (£4.99).

Perhaps there should be a V for Vendetta evening at the Drapers Arms. If Gibson would like to suggest a date in the next two weeks, I will publicise it.

In the meantime, it is important that the police understand it is not their business to use their influence to make and implement policy affecting people's privacy.
(OH YER!!!)

Figures show 39 pubs a week shutFeb 12 2009 A reco...

2009-02-12T15:29:00.000Z

Figures show 39 pubs a week shut
Feb 12 2009

A record number of pubs are closing every week in Britain, highlighting the "extreme" economic pressures facing the industry, new figures have showed.

A total of 39 pubs are shutting every week, three more than last year, including 19 in suburbs, eight in town centres and the rest in rural areas, the British Beer and Pub Association said.

The group, which represents the brewing and pub industry, criticised the Government over increases in beer taxes and millions of pounds of extra costs in red tape.

Rob Hayward, the association's chief executive, said: "With pubs closing at a record rate and job losses escalating, it is truly staggering that the Government is proposing to hit the sector with a £300 million bill for extra red tape this year alone.

"In fact, the Government openly state they believe that their new regulations will lead to more pub closures and job losses.

"Pub closures are a clear demonstration of the extreme financial and economic pressures facing the sector.

"At this time of deepening recession and rising unemployment, the Government should be actively looking at ways to support the community asset of the pub.

"They should not be introducing legislation that will condemn more pubs to closure and put more people out of work."

The association said 44,000 jobs had been lost in the industry in the past couple of years, warning that 59,000 could be axed.

Almost 2,000 pubs closed last year, 600 more than in 2007, the report said.

Fury as police won't investigate 'Lords-for-hire'...

2009-02-12T13:06:00.000Z

Fury as police won't investigate 'Lords-for-hire' scandal
By Kirsty Walker and Stephen Wright
Last updated at 12:16 AM on 12th February 2009

Comments (13) Add to My Stories
Scotland Yard was last night accused of 'backing away' from another high-profile political probe after deciding not to investigate the 'Lords for Hire' affair.

Assistant Commissioner John Yates will not proceed with a criminal investigation into allegations that four Labour peers said they would try to change laws for cash.

Mr Yates, who led the failed cash-for-honours inquiry, said he had 'carefully' reviewed the allegations, but claimed it was 'far from clear' whether an offence had been committed.

Michael Hoffman: I opened my letter to Pope Benedi...

2009-02-12T10:38:00.000Z

Michael Hoffman: I opened my letter to Pope Benedict with these pointed questions: “Is it not true that under the Second Vatican Council’s doctrine of Religious Liberty, that Bishop Williamson has the right to express his conscience and opinion on the subject of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz? Why is the Council’s doctrine of liberty being suspended in his case?

Then I put Pope Benedict on the spot by asking, “Is belief in the “Holocaust” a criterion for holding office in the Church. Is the rabbinic “Holocaust” mysticism now a dogma of the Roman Catholic Church?”

I brought the issue to a head by an incisive inquiry into the matter: “Are you aware of the extent to which the Crucifixion of Christ has been replaced by Auschwitz as the central ontological event of western history? Do you wish to be complicit in the disastrous effects that continue to accrue from this derogation of Jesus and deification of man?” View Hoffman’s Letter Here.

Br Nathanael: On February 9, 2009, the Seminary in Argentina of which Bishop Williamson was the Rector, dismissed him. What is your analysis of this event?

Michael Hoffman: The excuse used to fire Bishop Williamson was that a Catholic bishop cannot speak with ecclesiastical authority except on matters concerning “faith and morality.” It was stated by the Catholic superior in Argentina that Bishop Williamson violated protocol by speaking on matters that are “beyond faith and morality.”

But the issue really boils down to this: The rabbinic “Holocaust” is a Trojan horse inside Christianity and its refutation does indeed concern “faith and morality” since it betrays the Gospel by derogating Calvary and substituting it with Auschwitz as the central martyrdom of western history.

Bishop Williamson was removed because he offended the rabbis and the Judaics, not because of a heretical statement or for telling a lie. The criterion for removal from office in the modern Catholic Church is that which pleases or offends rabbis and Judaics. Everything else is diplomatic jargon employed to conceal this sickening fact.

Br Nathanael: Is Bishop Williamson facing charges against him for his “crime” of “holocaust-denial?”

Michael Hoffman: Indeed he is. Because of the Judaic lynch mop, Bishop Williamson is facing three years of imprisonment in Argentina, five years imprisonment in Germany, and prosecution in France due to an interview published in Der Spiegel, in which Williamson said he needed “proof” that the Nazis used gas chambers to murder Jews during the Holocaust before “recanting.”

The international campaign against Bishop Williamson is beginning to read like a chapter out of Kafka, or a surrealist dreamscape, and yet this is the Talmudic reality of our lives in the modern West, which is Zionist-rabbinic from top to bottom.

Br Nathanael: Do you think that Williamson will eventually cave in to the Judaics?

Michael Hoffman: Bishop Williamson has no automatic disposition to “recant,” as many under pressure from Judaic lynch mobs have done in the past.

Now, under pressure from no less a figure than the Roman Pontiff who ordered Bishop Williamson to fall prostrate before the homicidal gas chamber fable, he “does not plan to immediately comply with the Vatican’s demand that he recant.”

Printers, stop the presses. Historians, hold your manuscripts. A new page in the chronicle of our times is about to be written: “One honest man against the international Judaic thought police!”

Dear Anonymous (12:41 AM)As far as I know Tom Lind...

2009-02-12T00:47:00.000Z

Dear Anonymous (12:41 AM)

As far as I know Tom Linden has no connection to the Voice of Change pressure group. Please don't give up on your membership. Democratic change can and must come about eventually, and the BNP is still the only game in town.

From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)