Cllr Sharon Wilkinson
.
One of Lancashire's newest and best councillors talks about the latest disgraceful attempt to intimidate here.
.
Nick Griffin MEP & Andrew Brons MEP .
.
(Nick Griffin & Andrew Brons the BNP's first MEPs)
.
.
.
Lancaster BNP says: 'well done Yorkshire BNP, well done Andrew Brons MEP'. Also well done to the NW BNP and well done Nick Griffin MEP. Just one word can describe last night: FANTASTIC!
.
And finally:
First time candidate gets 13% support in Morecambe.
Vicky Blain (BNP candidate in the Poulton ward) thanks voters for their support.
.
13% support although not an exclusive vote (as most voters quite natural chose to use all 5 of their votes) is a good result for a ward which the party has not contested before. Well done Vicky!
.
Please forgive the poor sound quality which is due to the very windy conditions on the sea front in Morecambe earlier today.
.
Please forgive the poor sound quality which is due to the very windy conditions on the sea front in Morecambe earlier today.
Sharon Wilkinson wins in Lancashire.
Cllr Wilkinson (Right).
Sharon Wilkinson has been elected to Lancashire County Council with over 30% of the vote. Her victory in the Padiham and Burnley West ward, is a massive victory for the BNP.
.
.
Lancaster BNP says: 'well done Sharon'.
.
Today Wrexham, tomorrow Lancaster!
.
A typical small quiet British town in North Wales.
This is a supplement (single sided A5) to a local election leaflet that we put out about 2 years ago in Lancaster. This (we think) may help to explain what we're seeing in the video above.
(Click on it to view a sharper image.) 
.
On June 4th VOTE BNP!
"This is not my objective", I'm just after the expenses.
.
Shahid Malik MP (2009) Now an ex Government Minister!
"In 2005 we had 4 muslim MPs, in 2009 we'll have 8 muslim MPs, by 2014 we'll have 16 muslim MPs. Soon the whole parliament will be muslim." But please don't tell the British people just yet!
.
Enoch Powell MP (1968)
"Those the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad."
Now watch the video below to see how islam spreads it's control, and while you're watching it remember Shahid Malik's words: "soon the whole parliament will be muslim".
http://perfectlyhuman.multiply.com/video/item/8
.
Breaking News:
Shahid Malik resigns as a government minister.
While everyone must be assumed innocent until found guilty (or admits guilt), Mr Malik's expense claim of £2600 for a home entertainment centre and £730 for a massage chair, will be very hard to justify as a legitimate expense necessary to represent his constituents. Mr Malik if you're using a home entertainment system, you are not (at that time) working for you constituents, and therefore I can see no way that anyone in their right mind could justify that claim.
.
"In 2005 we had 4 muslim MPs, in 2009 we'll have 8 muslim MPs, by 2014 we'll have 16 muslim MPs. Soon the whole parliament will be muslim." But please don't tell the British people just yet!
.
Enoch Powell MP (1968)
"Those the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad."
Now watch the video below to see how islam spreads it's control, and while you're watching it remember Shahid Malik's words: "soon the whole parliament will be muslim".
http://perfectlyhuman.multiply.com/video/item/8
.
Breaking News:
Shahid Malik resigns as a government minister.
While everyone must be assumed innocent until found guilty (or admits guilt), Mr Malik's expense claim of £2600 for a home entertainment centre and £730 for a massage chair, will be very hard to justify as a legitimate expense necessary to represent his constituents. Mr Malik if you're using a home entertainment system, you are not (at that time) working for you constituents, and therefore I can see no way that anyone in their right mind could justify that claim.
.
Violent attack by hammer wielding left wing thugs.
.
(Tony Ward)
Although I have many disagreements with the Party's national leadership, and doubt (to put it mildly) Griffin's integrity, the overwhelming majority of our membership are without any doubt simply superb. Yesterday evening (Friday 13th March), according to reports carried by the BBC, a group of Searchlight and UAF inspired thugs mounted an unprovoked, and obviously pre planned, attacked on a legitimate BNP election event in South Manchester. Tony Ward, a local BNP activist, was seriously hurt by a hammer wielding thug.
.
It's also interesting to note that this attack was probably being planned at the same time as the Manchester Police force were sending officers out to intimidate owners of venues booked for democratic and totally legal election campaign events. The 'brownie pointers' at the top of our nation's police forces are clearly turning their officers into the paramilitary arm of the Labour party.
.
Far from discouraging activists these cowardly attacks, on our democratic way of life, will only serve to motivate our activists into the democratic action. The party's response to this must be, and I'm sure will be, to increase it's legitimate campaigning, leaving the job of bringing the violent criminals to justice to the still decent bobby on the beat. The cry leaving every decent citizens lips must be: ' such cowardly intimidation shall not be allowed to stand!'.
.
By
Chris Hill
.
.
More Griffin spin?
(Matt & Sadie Single)
Earlier this week reports appeared on the web to the effect that both Sadie and Matt were to appear in court yesterday (26th February 2009) to answer charges related to the release of a BNP membership list last November. Yesterday afternoon a press officer for Powys police, confirmed that neither have been charged with any offence, nor do they have plans to do so. Also yesterday evening I received a text message from Sadie also confirming this.
Members should be asking why did this (obviously planted) story appear now? Is it a case of the Party's leadership desperately trying to justify the disgraceful treatment of these two good Nationalists.
.Members should be asking why did this (obviously planted) story appear now? Is it a case of the Party's leadership desperately trying to justify the disgraceful treatment of these two good Nationalists.
Click on the link below to read Matt's full analysis of the membership leak:
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/Update Friday 8th May 2009:
A Powys police press officer confirmed today that they have no intention of charging either Sadie nor Matt with any offence in the near future, both simply remain on police bail pending further investigations.
.
Jewish, and 9/11, conspiracy theorists.
.
Please stop trying to post your nonsense here!
The anonymous poster who have tried to put a series of single web links (on the comment section of this blog) to the most ridiculous anti-Semitic videos, proving only that Jews (as a race) have contributed to western civilisation for the last thousand year at least. I should also like to point out, to theses deluded lunatics, that many people who class themselves as being British Jews have a far greater proportion of British ancestry than they do of Jewish ancestry, it is after all a religion as well as a race.
Now please bugger off and annoy someone else!
Please stop trying to post your nonsense here!
The anonymous poster who have tried to put a series of single web links (on the comment section of this blog) to the most ridiculous anti-Semitic videos, proving only that Jews (as a race) have contributed to western civilisation for the last thousand year at least. I should also like to point out, to theses deluded lunatics, that many people who class themselves as being British Jews have a far greater proportion of British ancestry than they do of Jewish ancestry, it is after all a religion as well as a race.
Now please bugger off and annoy someone else!
Church of England, or Church of intimidation?
Vasantha Gnanados (Right)
From a story on the Independent newspaper's web site:
Members of the General Synod voted to back a motion brought by Metropolitan Police civilian worker Vasantha Gnanadoss calling on bishops to formulate a comparable policy to the Association of Chief Police Officers' ban on police membership of the BNP…………………….
Brownie pointers are now not only infesting the top brass of our police force, but its civilian employees as well. I've been CofE since I was born & I went to a CofE school and (although I've never been christened), my family have been protestant for as far back as I can trace (circa late 1600's).
Well if this intimidation and indoctrination is what the church now represents, they can keep it. I've put up with their nonsense for long enough. An organisation that wants me to believe a man: turned water into wine, walked on water, fed 5000 people with just a couple of loaves and fishes etc. An organisation that believes god wrote a book that demands we stone: homosexuals, rebellious daughters, and anyone who works on a Sunday, then tells us to ignore it. An organisation that believes we should hand children over to homosexual couples for adoption. Well from now on I'm with Richard Dawkins, let's have separation of church and state (something I never thought I'd say).
Now just to help wean you off religion, take a look at this video:
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
A video worth watching.
.
An anonymous poster tried to put a link to this video in the comment section of this blog. Now why the poster chose to be gutless and post anonymously I don't know, but after viewing the video I think it's worth watching.
.
I don't normally agree with conspiracy theorists (most of whom are simply unhinged), but in this case no one can deny that our sovereignty has been hand to a foreign institution (ie. the EU) and therefore it seems reasonable to at least consider the possibility that someone may have committed treason. By posting this video I'm not necessarily endorsing all the views expressed in it, but I do think it raises issues that we all need to think about.
.
Finally gutless people who post anonymously are the very reason that Heath and Co were able to get away with this. Until the people of our nation, like the anonymous poster who sent me this link, are willing to stand up and be counted we will continue to be sold down the river by our political masters.
.
I say to that gutless anonymous poster; find a back bone then stand up to be counted!
.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
An anonymous poster tried to put a link to this video in the comment section of this blog. Now why the poster chose to be gutless and post anonymously I don't know, but after viewing the video I think it's worth watching.
.
I don't normally agree with conspiracy theorists (most of whom are simply unhinged), but in this case no one can deny that our sovereignty has been hand to a foreign institution (ie. the EU) and therefore it seems reasonable to at least consider the possibility that someone may have committed treason. By posting this video I'm not necessarily endorsing all the views expressed in it, but I do think it raises issues that we all need to think about.
.
Finally gutless people who post anonymously are the very reason that Heath and Co were able to get away with this. Until the people of our nation, like the anonymous poster who sent me this link, are willing to stand up and be counted we will continue to be sold down the river by our political masters.
.
I say to that gutless anonymous poster; find a back bone then stand up to be counted!
.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
NWN rejected this comment.
In the spring of 1945 Allied troops (British, American, Canadian, New Zealand, South African, Rhodesian, etc etc.) in the West, like and Russians in the east, liberated the Nazi death camps. Is anyone really suggesting that all these solders (including British Tommies) lied?
.
Many Papists still believe in the pope's infallibility. All believe that a man: turned water into wine, walked on water, fed 5000 people with two loaves and fishes etc etc. Even worse up until about 10 years ago papist doctrine still held that all Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. Is it any wonder then that some still ignore all the evidence and deny the unavoidable conclusions that results from that evidence. They do this in the same way that young earth creationist ignore the evidence that the earth is billions of years old.
.
I will however take just a few lines to answer two of the most easily refuted arguments he makes:
1.
That gassing by Cyanide would have been impossible because it stays on clothing, and so would have killed the guards who removed the bodies.
Answer:
The gas chambers were made to look like shower blocks, and the victims were told that they were to be given a shower, and therefore this meant they were naked when they were pushed into the chambers. Also it wasn't the guards who removed the bodies, this was done by other prisoners to save their own lives so the Nazis didn't care if there was a risk of cyanide poisoning still around, the workers were easily replaceable.
.
2.
Large chimneys would have been needed to remove the gas or the whole camp would have been killed.
Answer
Once again this is nonsense; the chambers were built downwind of the main camps for this very reason, and on days that the wind was not blowing away from the camps the chambers were not used. Records found after the war, along with the testimony of SS guards, confirm this.
.
Face the undeniable fact that millions of people were murdered by the Nazis in the 10 years between between 1935- 1945.
.
Now if someone can tell me how all this justifies diverting this site from the struggle for the survival of our nation to irrelevant history. Griffin must be laughing his head off to see the only serious web site, that opposes his dictatorship, become side tracked and discredited by this rubbish. The year is 2009 not 1945 let's move on from the tragedies of the past to preventing our own peoples destruction.
.
Many Papists still believe in the pope's infallibility. All believe that a man: turned water into wine, walked on water, fed 5000 people with two loaves and fishes etc etc. Even worse up until about 10 years ago papist doctrine still held that all Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. Is it any wonder then that some still ignore all the evidence and deny the unavoidable conclusions that results from that evidence. They do this in the same way that young earth creationist ignore the evidence that the earth is billions of years old.
.
I will however take just a few lines to answer two of the most easily refuted arguments he makes:
1.
That gassing by Cyanide would have been impossible because it stays on clothing, and so would have killed the guards who removed the bodies.
Answer:
The gas chambers were made to look like shower blocks, and the victims were told that they were to be given a shower, and therefore this meant they were naked when they were pushed into the chambers. Also it wasn't the guards who removed the bodies, this was done by other prisoners to save their own lives so the Nazis didn't care if there was a risk of cyanide poisoning still around, the workers were easily replaceable.
.
2.
Large chimneys would have been needed to remove the gas or the whole camp would have been killed.
Answer
Once again this is nonsense; the chambers were built downwind of the main camps for this very reason, and on days that the wind was not blowing away from the camps the chambers were not used. Records found after the war, along with the testimony of SS guards, confirm this.
.
Face the undeniable fact that millions of people were murdered by the Nazis in the 10 years between between 1935- 1945.
.
Now if someone can tell me how all this justifies diverting this site from the struggle for the survival of our nation to irrelevant history. Griffin must be laughing his head off to see the only serious web site, that opposes his dictatorship, become side tracked and discredited by this rubbish. The year is 2009 not 1945 let's move on from the tragedies of the past to preventing our own peoples destruction.
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
PLEASE NOTE: COMMENTS ON THE CURRENT SITUATION IN GAZA FALL OUTSIDE THE REMIT OF THIS BLOG.
.
This is a local pro BNP blog, comments on either the party or the Lancaster & Morecambe area are most welcome.
Comments on foreign wars not involving the British people fall outside the remit of this blog, and should be sent to more appropriate sites.
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
Comments are welcome.
.
Genuine comments (of all points of view) are welcome on this blog. But simply cutting and pasting links to other sites, does not come under the realm of a genuine comment.
.
This is a local Pro BNP blog, please try to keep comments relevant to: Lancaster or the BNP. Anonymous comments on the current events in Gaza will be rejected as not being relevant to this blog.
.
Further: more leeway will be given to identifiable sources than anonymous posters.
.
Genuine comments (of all points of view) are welcome on this blog. But simply cutting and pasting links to other sites, does not come under the realm of a genuine comment.
.
This is a local Pro BNP blog, please try to keep comments relevant to: Lancaster or the BNP. Anonymous comments on the current events in Gaza will be rejected as not being relevant to this blog.
.
Further: more leeway will be given to identifiable sources than anonymous posters.
.
Happy New Year to all.
.
I'm afraid I've been a little lacks in my posting recently, and for that I apologise.
From everyone at Lancaster BNP can I wish you all a very happy New Year.
.
I hope to be able to include some reports on the activities of the Lancaster group again very soon.
Am I the first direct victim of the publication of the list?
Tonight I took my usual weekend stroll down into Lancaster, in order to visit my usual three public houses. one pint of bitter in each. Nothing wrong with that you may think, and of course you'd be right. After consuming my second pint I looked into my normal last watering hole and (without having to ask) was served with my usual pint of bitter.
After about 20 mins of sitting quietly at the end of the bar, the landlady came up to me and made some comment about having a politician in tonight. I was surprised as I've never spoken to her before except to order a drink. Next thing she says I'm barred, then makes a point of pointing me out to all the bar staff as such.
Now given I've been drinking in that pub (twice a week one pint each visit) for about five years now without any problems at all, is this just a coincidence or do I have the honour of being the first direct victim of the list?
Believe me I'm not saying being barred from a single pub, matches the Liverpool police officer who may lose his job, but small as this may be is it the first direct (successful*) intimidation?
If so I really can hold my head up high!
After about 20 mins of sitting quietly at the end of the bar, the landlady came up to me and made some comment about having a politician in tonight. I was surprised as I've never spoken to her before except to order a drink. Next thing she says I'm barred, then makes a point of pointing me out to all the bar staff as such.
Now given I've been drinking in that pub (twice a week one pint each visit) for about five years now without any problems at all, is this just a coincidence or do I have the honour of being the first direct victim of the list?
Believe me I'm not saying being barred from a single pub, matches the Liverpool police officer who may lose his job, but small as this may be is it the first direct (successful*) intimidation?
If so I really can hold my head up high!
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
*By successful I mean it's effective immediately, no appeal, and I feel right proud!
PS.
Please do not think I'm in any way comparing losing your livelihood with being barred from an over priced and run down pub.
To learn more about real persecution click on the link below:
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/
.
To learn more about real persecution click on the link below:
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/
.
Membership leak.
A response to the quite outrages accusations made by Griffin, against the December six, can be viewed at:
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/
The 5% compromise.
.
The 5% compromise is in fact no compromise at all, and I’m convinced that this 5% level was Griffin’s intention all along, because without a membership list it’s totally unachievable, and leaves him in the position of an unchallengeable dictator. Mr Griffin has no political ambition for the BNP at all, to him it’s simply a source of income. For the sake of our nation, and our people, he must be stopped.
.
We must be honest with ourselves now, the only way we can save our nation is by getting MP’s elected, then ask yourselves under Griffin’s leadership are we ever likely to achieve that? Mr Griffin does not want a serious political party, or even a party that grows much above 6 or 7 thousand members, simple because he’ll lose control of it. Last Sunday there was no opposition to Griffin, despite what people may think they saw at the EGM, all that was just another of Griffin’s clever road shows again. Once again can I ask people to be honest and ask themselves if Collett would ever dare speak against Griffin, knowing that by doing so he was risking his position on the BNP’s gravy train? We must all now face the truth: we were all set up!
.
.
To learn more about the current drive to democratise the party, click on the link below.
.
The 5% compromise is in fact no compromise at all, and I’m convinced that this 5% level was Griffin’s intention all along, because without a membership list it’s totally unachievable, and leaves him in the position of an unchallengeable dictator. Mr Griffin has no political ambition for the BNP at all, to him it’s simply a source of income. For the sake of our nation, and our people, he must be stopped.
.
We must be honest with ourselves now, the only way we can save our nation is by getting MP’s elected, then ask yourselves under Griffin’s leadership are we ever likely to achieve that? Mr Griffin does not want a serious political party, or even a party that grows much above 6 or 7 thousand members, simple because he’ll lose control of it. Last Sunday there was no opposition to Griffin, despite what people may think they saw at the EGM, all that was just another of Griffin’s clever road shows again. Once again can I ask people to be honest and ask themselves if Collett would ever dare speak against Griffin, knowing that by doing so he was risking his position on the BNP’s gravy train? We must all now face the truth: we were all set up!
.
.
To learn more about the current drive to democratise the party, click on the link below.
.
A democratic EGM, just so long as you agree with Mr Griffin of course.
Some members may be wondering why they didn't see me at the EGM this afternoon, well don't worry I wasn't hurt in a car crash or anything like that. No the reason you didn't see me using my democratic right (as a member of 10 years standing) to oppose Griffin's constitutional amendments is quite simple: I was turned away at the gates.
.
On arriving at the RWB site, with about a dozen or so other VoC members, we were asked to show our membership cards by a member of the BNP security team. On reading the name on my card he asked me to stand to one side, because someone wanted to speak to me, while the rest of our group were allowed onto the site. After about 2 minutes Dave Shapcott turned up and said, to three of the security staff on the gate:: ' This man has a 5 year ban after he made trouble at the RWB last year please ask the police to remove him from the site and arrest him if he doesn't leave', whereupon security called a policeman over and asked him to remove me from the area. While this was going on I pointed out to Mr Shapcott the fact that I hadn't attended the RWB last year, only for him to responded 'well I meant two years ago then'. This is of course total nonsense, and although he had no authority, or right, to prevent any card carrying member attending the EGM, I was told by the police that if I even approached the gates again, I'd be arrested immediately without further question.
.
The last RWB I attended was in 2006, and the people who attended with me that year, including both Lancaster & Blackpool members, can confirm that not only didn't I start any trouble, I wasn't even remotely involved in any incident what so ever. In fact in 2006 the party reported the whole RWB event went off completely without any incidents what so ever. And ask yourself had I of caused any problems that year would I have been allowed to:
.
1. Stand as a BNP election candidate twice.
.
2. Attend the Blackpool conference last year as a voting member.
.
3. Been given the extra responsibility of the Preston organiser's job.
.
all since the RWB in 2006, of course not!
.
This is total nonsense and should demonstrate to every member the total corruption of the Griffin/Collett gang and their cronies.
.
EGM meeting.
Nick Griffin is attempting to secure his position as Chairman/dictator of the party by a change in the party's constitution, that will effectively prevent any challenge to his leadership for the next four years..
.
.
At an EGM, to be held straight after the RWB on Sunday 17th August, he will try to get the membership to agree to the change. He must be stopped! Members from the north west wishing to attend the EGM can contact me and I'll try and arrange transport.
.
Griffin can make no charge to enter the meeting so, given the return distance from Preston being about about 250 miles and even with petrol at over £5 a gallon, it should be possible to keep the cost down to about £12 a person (less from the Manchester area). Not a lot when you consider what's at stake is it?
.
Let's take the Duke of Wellington advice (at least in part), when he was asked how to win battles his advice was simple, 'turn up first with the most men'. We can't be first, but together we can make sure we have the most men.
.
Contact:
Chris Hill
chris@chrishill.freeserve.co.uk
01524-64307
.
To learn more about the current drive to democratise the party, click on the link below.
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/
.
Lancaster's day of action.
.
Saturday 19th of last month saw seven BNP member set up a stall in the centre of Lancaster to distribute leaflets, and show the people of Lancaster that the BNP membership have not forgotten them. However I am sad to have to report that none of the brave BNP members, who faced a torrent of threats and abuse from masked UAF thugs, were from the Lancaster area. The reason for this was not that the few remaining members in Lancaster are lazy or afraid of a little abuse, its simply that no one bothered to inform us about the event. Yes it appears now that BNP activities are to be held without the involvement of local members, is this yet another of Griffin's improvements or simply a necessity now that the Griffin/Collett gang has decimated the membership at the grass-roots level?
.
Anyway to those out of town members who did take part, the remnants of the old Lancaster & Morecambe group says 'well done lads and lasses all'.
.To learn more about the current drive to democratise the party, click on the link below.
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com/
.
Where does the party go now?
With the failure of Cllr Colin Auty to secure the 100 signatures needed for a leadership challenge, everyone should now be asking: just exactly how many members do we have left?Speaking to people over the last eight weeks, I've heard the same thing again and again: 'I do support Colin, but I've not rejoined this year'. Given Chris Jackson's leadership vote last year of over 300, Colin's failure to secure 100 signatures must be seen as an indication of how the Griffin/Collett gang are, quite simply, decimating the membership.
.
Click below for full details.
.
http://challengeforleadership.blogspot.com
.
.
Richard Barnbrook, London Assembly member.
Preston & Lancaster Voice of Change says: 'Well done Richard Barnbrook, and Well done London BNP.'
Lions lead by fools, are still lions!
Mugabe, Brown, & Griffin: just three of a kind!
(Rejected newspaper advert, shown above)
Yesterday, just 3 hours before the paper’s submission deadline, the editor of a local Wigan newspaper phoned Dr Charles Mather (Chairman of the Wigan BNP branch) and informed him that he was rejecting a BNP election advert (which had been both accepted and paid for a week previously), on the grounds that it mentioned the Tibetan’s struggle for independence and also because it criticised other parties standing in the election. Of course this was merely a poorly put together hotchpotch of an excuse, who has ever heard of a party not being allowed to mention events in another country, or being stopped from criticising its political opponents? Or rather I should ask: ‘who has heard of such things in a democratic country’.
I'm also afraid the mass media simply won’t take the story up as it won't win them any brownie points with their political masters. Democracy in Britain is a sham, in fact the only real difference between Mugabe's Rhodesia, Brown's UK, and Griffin's BNP is that Mugabe leads the way in coming up with new ideas to fix elections, while the other two only follow.
I just wonder how long it will be, (given that: police, prison officers and senior civil servants are not allowed to be BNP members) before people in certain jobs are given special voting papers that have the BNP's box blacked out so they can't vote for us. Sounds far fetched I know, but so would the ban on these people joining a perfectly legal political party 30 years ago.
Another incident I learned about just a few days ago, also shows that the grassroots BNP members should not become complacent about the struggle for democracy within our own party. Steve Thompson (Ex Aberdeen organiser) has had a block put on his membership renewal, simply because of his support for democratic constitutional change. Now I've only met the man once (Blackpool conference last Nov), but he seemed a very genuine guy who has stood for the party in local council elections last year. Griffin's purge of good people is still going on!
All in all we really do live in fascist times, don't we?
Chris Hill
(Chairman: Preston & Lancaster Voice of Change)
I'm also afraid the mass media simply won’t take the story up as it won't win them any brownie points with their political masters. Democracy in Britain is a sham, in fact the only real difference between Mugabe's Rhodesia, Brown's UK, and Griffin's BNP is that Mugabe leads the way in coming up with new ideas to fix elections, while the other two only follow.
I just wonder how long it will be, (given that: police, prison officers and senior civil servants are not allowed to be BNP members) before people in certain jobs are given special voting papers that have the BNP's box blacked out so they can't vote for us. Sounds far fetched I know, but so would the ban on these people joining a perfectly legal political party 30 years ago.
Another incident I learned about just a few days ago, also shows that the grassroots BNP members should not become complacent about the struggle for democracy within our own party. Steve Thompson (Ex Aberdeen organiser) has had a block put on his membership renewal, simply because of his support for democratic constitutional change. Now I've only met the man once (Blackpool conference last Nov), but he seemed a very genuine guy who has stood for the party in local council elections last year. Griffin's purge of good people is still going on!
All in all we really do live in fascist times, don't we?
Chris Hill
(Chairman: Preston & Lancaster Voice of Change)
Lancaster says 'good luck to the BNP six'.
Six good and honest BNP members, under suspension since last December’s purge by the dictator Griffin, are today appearing at Manchester Crown court (Civil division) to answer a court summons brought by the Griffin/Collett gang.
.
The allegations of wrong doing made against the six are of course totally ridicules and one has to wonder who thought them up, and when. As to who, we can be pretty sure that Nick Griffin and Lee Barnes are behind this spiteful action against people whose only crime was to bring to the attention of the membership the chaos being caused by Mark. Considering the question of when and where they thought it up, we can only speculate. Griffin may have had the idea while sitting in the extension to his home, which was paid for from party funds. Or it may well have been made by Barnes while he, and the rest of the Griffin/Collett gang, were on that now infamous Spanish holiday last month, which once again was paid for out of the party's funds.
.
Spiteful vengeance and financial mismanagement are just two of the many good reasons to replace the dictator Griffin, and the small group of 'yes men' he has acquired around him, in a democratic leadership election this June.
.
As for this morning’s case we can only say: Good luck to the BNP six: Cllr Sadie Graham, Ian Dawson, Kenny & Nicholla Smith, Steve Blake, & Matt Single.
.
Spiteful vengeance and financial mismanagement are just two of the many good reasons to replace the dictator Griffin, and the small group of 'yes men' he has acquired around him, in a democratic leadership election this June.
.
As for this morning’s case we can only say: Good luck to the BNP six: Cllr Sadie Graham, Ian Dawson, Kenny & Nicholla Smith, Steve Blake, & Matt Single.
Free speech proscribed by the Griffin/Collett gang.
The latest ‘official’ BNP bulletin proscribes both the EiE blog and VoC web site. The bulletin then goes on to make veiled threats against members who use their right of free speech to post on either site, describing supporters of the VOC movement as leftwing troublemakers & neo-Nazis. The two characters pictured above, Mark Collett and Nick Griffin, made a big point just a year or so back about their right to freedom of speech, now it appears they think that freespeech should be limited to people who agree with them.
There is in fact a case for prescribing a very limited number of web sites, one good example of which is a nasty little site called Redwatch. Redwatch publishes photos of little old ladies protesting against American military bases, and students demonstrating against road widening schemes. Therefore that site is quite rightly proscribed, not to limit freedom of speech, but to protect innocent people from the threat of violence.
However this new proscription against the EiE blog, and the VOC web site, is nothing more than a very crude attempt to intimidate members into toeing the line. But it also clearly demonstrates how desperate the corrupt Griffin/Collett gang are now getting, and how out of touch they are with the grassroots membership of the party.
Intimidate a BNP member, you’d have more luck knitting fog!
There is in fact a case for prescribing a very limited number of web sites, one good example of which is a nasty little site called Redwatch. Redwatch publishes photos of little old ladies protesting against American military bases, and students demonstrating against road widening schemes. Therefore that site is quite rightly proscribed, not to limit freedom of speech, but to protect innocent people from the threat of violence.
However this new proscription against the EiE blog, and the VOC web site, is nothing more than a very crude attempt to intimidate members into toeing the line. But it also clearly demonstrates how desperate the corrupt Griffin/Collett gang are now getting, and how out of touch they are with the grassroots membership of the party.
Intimidate a BNP member, you’d have more luck knitting fog!
North West Region's first Voice of Change meeting.
Last Wednesday evening around 40 British National Party officials and activists attended a Voice of Change meeting in Blackburn. They were, in the most part, people whom I recognised as being amongst the most active members of the party in the North West and Yorkshire areas, and there were at least seven current or ex local councillors included in the audience.
The Meeting started with the Chairman, Dave Jones, reading out an apology from Cllr Sadie Graham. Cllr Graham had been scheduled to speak at the meeting, but because of unexpected council commitments she was unable to attend. After which Bev Jones (ex-NW regional organiser and National fundraiser) gave a brief, but very enlightening, summery of events leading up to the present crisis within the party. Questions and comments from the floor were numerous during Bev’s talk and many problems, which local officials had experienced over the last three or four years with the party’s management, came to light. It is now well over two months since the first round of expulsions, which sparked the current crisis within the party, but it must now be very clear to everyone that many local officials have been covering up for both the mistakes and gross incompetence of the leadership for years.
After a break Charles Mather (Wigan organiser) talked about where he thought the party should go from here, and how with goodwill on both sides this crisis could be resolved to the benefit of both the party, and the British people. Discussions then continued with contributions being made from all sections of the meeting, including the Yorkshire contingent, about ways of moving the party forward while waiting for the upcoming leadership challenge. The meeting ended with a collection for the family defence fund. Many members stayed around to talk afterwards, and the depth of feeling became even clearer than before: the British National Party belongs to its members not to a small Griffin/Collett gang.
Enemies of the British National Party and the British People, from what ever side, should take note: The grassroots membership of the party intend to take the party back, making it fully electable and fit for national government. The BNP is set to make a difference for the British people, get on board or get out of our way!
The Meeting started with the Chairman, Dave Jones, reading out an apology from Cllr Sadie Graham. Cllr Graham had been scheduled to speak at the meeting, but because of unexpected council commitments she was unable to attend. After which Bev Jones (ex-NW regional organiser and National fundraiser) gave a brief, but very enlightening, summery of events leading up to the present crisis within the party. Questions and comments from the floor were numerous during Bev’s talk and many problems, which local officials had experienced over the last three or four years with the party’s management, came to light. It is now well over two months since the first round of expulsions, which sparked the current crisis within the party, but it must now be very clear to everyone that many local officials have been covering up for both the mistakes and gross incompetence of the leadership for years.
After a break Charles Mather (Wigan organiser) talked about where he thought the party should go from here, and how with goodwill on both sides this crisis could be resolved to the benefit of both the party, and the British people. Discussions then continued with contributions being made from all sections of the meeting, including the Yorkshire contingent, about ways of moving the party forward while waiting for the upcoming leadership challenge. The meeting ended with a collection for the family defence fund. Many members stayed around to talk afterwards, and the depth of feeling became even clearer than before: the British National Party belongs to its members not to a small Griffin/Collett gang.
Enemies of the British National Party and the British People, from what ever side, should take note: The grassroots membership of the party intend to take the party back, making it fully electable and fit for national government. The BNP is set to make a difference for the British people, get on board or get out of our way!
Honesty-Democracy-Electability.
Last month, a Parish meeting Hall in the small English village of Brinsley in Nottinghamshire, saw well over a 100 BNP members attend a meeting to discuss much needed democratic changes to the party’s constitution, and how these can best be achieved.
Cllr Roger Robertson, who until last month was the BNP’s SE regional organiser, chaired the Conference. Also on the top table with Cllr Robertson were; Cllr Sadie Graham, Kenny Smith, and Steve Blake.
The first half of the meeting saw, Cllr Sadie Graham, Kenny Smith, and Steve Blake give detailed accounts of the troubles and mismanagement that led up to the current crisis within the party. People listening to theses accounts were left in no doubt that: most if not all the problem could be laid at the feet of just one man, Mark Collett! Although of course, as Chairman, the final responsibility for allowing the megalomaniac Collett to rake this havoc on the party, must be Nick Griffin's. Kenny explained that he had started the ‘Enough is Enough’ (EiE) blog, only after the Chairman had subverted the party’s constitution and threatened to sack anyone complaining about the situation. At that point his duty to the ordinary grassroots members, who pay his wages, clearly outweighed any duty of loyalty he owed to a Chairman who was allowing this damage to continue unchallenged. The next speaker was Cllr Sadie Graham, who gave an extremely professional presentation about the essential changes that are need, within the BNP, if we are to become a major political party that can take on and beat any of the current big three parties. These changes, she explained, are also needed for the internal stability of the Party.
After a short break, questions were taken from the floor and the feelings of ordinary members on how to take the party forward, to a fully democratic and electable party, were canvassed. Shows of Hands were taken from motions laid by members to the meeting. One of these votes decided by an overwhelming majority that no new party should be considered, and that far from wanting to split the party, this movement is a pressure group for democratic change within the party. To this end a leadership challenge will be mounted, as soon as the current constitution allows. Although who that candidate will be will depend on the whether the currently expelled members get their membership back in time for that election.
It was also decided that the issue of supporting, and taking an active part in, current BNP campaigns and other events should be left to the individual’s own conscience. The meeting ended with a round up of planned events and the sale of merchandise to raise funds for the family defence fund, which was given by Bev Jones.
Everyone who attended the conference yesterday can now be in no doubt that: Griffin has bitten off more than he can chew this time!
.
A Final word about how we should progress now.
My own view on this issue of members taking part in upcoming BNP events, and campaigns, is: that we should make an effort to take part in every available way we can. And we should do this while clearly identifying ourselves as part of the VofC pressure group, ie start our leadership challenge now! Obviously a badge saying ‘Griffin must go’ is a none starter, but one that is recognised by our own members as identifying us as VofC supporters, while meaning something entirely different to the voting public, would do the trick nicely. If we include the words: ‘Honesty’ ‘Democracy’ and ‘Electability’, no one could argue that these are not very laudable aims.
Up to now we have allowed Griffin and his cohorts to choose the field of battle, we must take this fight into the very heart of the party, its grassroots membership. We must be seen as modernisers, whose aim is to move the party forward, not as splitters, and we must tar Griffin with Collett (the most disliked person in the BNP) at every opportunity. Make our case: what image do you want for the BNP: Cllr Sadie Graham (well respected councillor and mother) or Mark Collett (Young Nazi and Proud)?
A fully electable and democratic BNP is only 5 months away: let’s start our campaign today!
.
Link to Sadie's account of events:
at http://enoughisenoughnick.blogspot.com/2008/01/lies-desperation-and-more-lies-cllr.html
A concise, and very informative, analysis of the current troubles within the party.
.
By Roger Robertson
.
.
Now is time for reflection, taking stock of the current situation and moving forward in a concise and controlled way to the benefit of the Party.Firstly, a bit about myself. I am 61 years of age, married with 2 grown up children and own a small telecoms business. I have been a party member for several years and was the South East Regional Organiser until I recently resigned this post.
.
When I joined the BNP I made no secret of this to my friends and colleagues. Many threw their hands up in horror as if I had taken leave of my senses and there were even mutterings in my Lodge that I should resign. However, people that knew me realised that I do not make rash judgements and were quite willing to give me the benefit of the doubt. Over the years, and with what has happened politically, my friends have come to realise that I made the correct decision and a few have joined the Party. Many others give their tacit support, but cannot join because they consider it a step too far and are reluctant to face any opprobrium. They realise that the vast majority of the BNP are ordinary decent people and have the same concerns as themselves but on a professional basis they simply consider that we have too much baggage to become a member and that we are not well enough organised (This I fear is what is holding us back from taking Middle England votes). I have done my best to counter these arguments, but was finding myself increasingly frustrated by several factors. Firstly, although we promote freedom of speech, I found that whenever I spoke to Nick about party business or strategy he always replied in the first person singular! Secondly I was becoming increasingly frustrated with the incompetence of the Treasury Department, plus a lack of transparency with our funds.
.
I also had concerns over Mark Collett and found the Advisory Council Meetings nothing more than a talking shop (No doubt the "Central Management Team" will find themselves equally ineffectual). To my delight, I found others, more senior, within the Party who had had the same concerns for considerably longer than myself, which they had also conveyed to Nick but to no avail. These are all well documented and thus I need not recount them again. However, my awakening came at the Blackpool Conference when, in conjunction with Sadie, Kenny and Steve we had a "private" meeting with Nick to resolve the situation of Ian Dawson being barred from the Conference plus the aforementioned issues. In my business and social life I have been in some involved and highly charged meetings but this was the first time where I have ever seen such truculence and a total disregard of the opposing viewpoint despite our protestations of loyalty. I knew then that there were going to be major problems!
.
Moving forward, where are we now? Firstly it is quite clear that there is now no room for compromise. The Party is in disarray at the top. It is effectively bankrupt and yet we have had these appeal letters being sent out at a huge cost. We have Nick Griffin telling us on the BNP web site that we are neo Nazis, (as did his poodle, Simon Darby, on News Night) and that there is now a "mopping up" operation going on as the "revolt" is over. We have had any number of well documented illegal acts perpetrated by the hierarchy and, with this South African "Security Department" in a position of power the whole ethos of an open and responsible political party has been lost (This had already been lost to a degree by Nick Griffin calling those who voted against him "vermin" - what epithets are coming our way I wonder?). All of this can be firmly laid at the door of one person - Nick Griffin.
.
What then is the way forward? We have to communicate, via mail, in a factual and non judgemental manner, the precise happenings and how and why they have come about to all our members (This is of major importance as I know some of the Organisers in the South East are deliberately witholding information from members). We then need to promulgate our proposals for moving the Party forward and making it electable.
.
Firstly we get rid of the baggage. This will then generate donations from those presently holding back, which will enable us to build an infrastructure which is fair, democratic and, above all open and accountable to its members (I have a close personal friend who, being a Chartered Accountant, offered his services to the Party for a nominal remuneration which was rejected out of hand). There are many more of these able and Professionally qualified people who will willingly work to promote a Party dedicated to preserving the culture and heritage of this land for their children, grandchildren and generations yet to come. We separate the Political from the Executive and, without going into detail, we set up an infrastructure capable of winning us seats. We have "shadow spokesmen/women", experts in their subjects, who are quoted in and by the press and we move away from one person speaking on every subject.We are also unique in that we have Members from every part of the political spectrum and if we can build on this we will be in a position to influence decisions made at the highest level and, take power before time runs out and this Island, our homeland, is reduced to a lawless, third world wasteland where Sharia Law, the gun and the bomb takes precedence over all that we hold dear and our descendants are strangers in their own land.
.
.
Notes on the above posting.
.
The above was taken directly from a comment, made by Roger Robertson, which appeared on the EiE blog.
.
My thanks go out to Roger for his concise, and very informative, description and analysis of the current troubles within the party. Roger's own solutions I think, also represent what many others (including myself) would like to see happen now.
.
This Current chaos may well lead to a far more democratic, and electable BNP. A BNP that many more decent people can join, without fear of the stigma that attaches itself to anyone connected to Mark Collett.
.
It's time now to move forward!
.
.
Link below is to the Enough is Enough modernisers Web Site.
.
An open letter to the BNP's party Manager.
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY
Preston & Lancaster Group
PO Box 733
Lancaster
LA1 3WP
Tel No 07870726820
27th December 2007
Dear Mr Brewer,
I am writing to resign both my position as the Preston & Lancaster organiser, and the Chorley contact, although I will be keeping my party membership. And I am writing now to explain my resignation to you.
As you know there has, since mid December, been a bitter struggle going on within the party between two groups, one of which wants to continue the modernisation of the party, which has been responsible for the electoral success we have had over the last few years. While the other, at least in my opinion, wants to hold the party back for their own selfish ends.
I will not go into great detail about the dispute, but will just say the first group is led by Cllr Sadie Graham: a hard working district councillor, and much respected & well liked lady, with exactly the sort of image needed if our party is to become truly electable in the eyes of the voting public. While the other camp is backing Mark Collett of ‘Young Nazi and Proud’ fame, as the next leader of the party when our current chairman steps down. Unfortunately Mr Griffin has aligned himself squarely with this last group, and it is alleged that he has been prepared to break the law, by bugging phones and intercepting and altering personal emails, in order to discredit anyone who opposes that group.
Unfortunately it is not only Mark Collett’s image that is holding back the party, although that does hang like a millstone around the necks of all our members, he has also caused chaos within the senior management echelons of the party. And it is this situation, rather than his image, that has led directly to this current crisis.
Let me assure you that, despite statements made by an official party spokesman on television last weeks, this is not an attempt at a Neo-Nazi coup, in fact it is just the opposite. The essence of this dispute is whether the party can prosper without a capable management team, and with a millstone like Mark Collett around the neck of every one of our candidates at election times. How many of us can really say, with our hands on our heart, that the name Mark Collett does not come up whenever we mention the British National Party in a conversation. I truly believe that a victory for Cllr Graham’s modernisers will put an end to that nightmare once and for all.
I still hope one day to be, once again, the local Chairman of a truly electable British National Party branch, but unless we win this current struggle to modernise our party that will I’m afraid remain just a dream
Yours sincerely,
Chris Hill
(Organiser Preston & Lancaster BNP & Chorley area Contact)
I am writing to resign both my position as the Preston & Lancaster organiser, and the Chorley contact, although I will be keeping my party membership. And I am writing now to explain my resignation to you.
As you know there has, since mid December, been a bitter struggle going on within the party between two groups, one of which wants to continue the modernisation of the party, which has been responsible for the electoral success we have had over the last few years. While the other, at least in my opinion, wants to hold the party back for their own selfish ends.
I will not go into great detail about the dispute, but will just say the first group is led by Cllr Sadie Graham: a hard working district councillor, and much respected & well liked lady, with exactly the sort of image needed if our party is to become truly electable in the eyes of the voting public. While the other camp is backing Mark Collett of ‘Young Nazi and Proud’ fame, as the next leader of the party when our current chairman steps down. Unfortunately Mr Griffin has aligned himself squarely with this last group, and it is alleged that he has been prepared to break the law, by bugging phones and intercepting and altering personal emails, in order to discredit anyone who opposes that group.
Unfortunately it is not only Mark Collett’s image that is holding back the party, although that does hang like a millstone around the necks of all our members, he has also caused chaos within the senior management echelons of the party. And it is this situation, rather than his image, that has led directly to this current crisis.
Let me assure you that, despite statements made by an official party spokesman on television last weeks, this is not an attempt at a Neo-Nazi coup, in fact it is just the opposite. The essence of this dispute is whether the party can prosper without a capable management team, and with a millstone like Mark Collett around the neck of every one of our candidates at election times. How many of us can really say, with our hands on our heart, that the name Mark Collett does not come up whenever we mention the British National Party in a conversation. I truly believe that a victory for Cllr Graham’s modernisers will put an end to that nightmare once and for all.
I still hope one day to be, once again, the local Chairman of a truly electable British National Party branch, but unless we win this current struggle to modernise our party that will I’m afraid remain just a dream
Yours sincerely,
Chris Hill
(Organiser Preston & Lancaster BNP & Chorley area Contact)
Merry Christmas everyone.
News about the Lancaster & Morecambe group's planned activities for the New Year, will be posted in the next few days.
Until then enjoy the holidays everyone.
Who now runs the BNP, Mark Collett or the membership?
This present struggle is clearly now a fight to decide who is in charge of the British National Party, its members or Mark Collett, It's that simple!
UAF flops in Blackpool.
Having just returned from Blackpool, after attending this weekend’s conference, I would like to make the following observations.
The 25 seconds video clip above taken from one of the hotel’s 3rd floor windows, at the height of the demo, clearly shows that less than 70 people (including the yellow jacketed marshals) turned out for this supposed UAF mass demo. Unfortunately some TV news reports deliberately gave a vastly inflated figure, for the attendance at the demonstration, of around 200. Compare this video to Granada's report of the demonstration, at link below.
We were told that people were to be bussed in from all over Lancashire and the surrounding counties, including mass turnouts of UNISON and other TUC members from all over the North West. UAF really are now a spent force, and these days only attract total losers, and the mentally ill.
The conference itself was very professionally run, and a fantastic success, with 260 delegates attending (the maximum fire regulations allow). Although the Kimberly is a fantastic venue for smaller conferences, a larger venue will undoubtedly be needed next year. The BNP is moving forward come on board, or get out of the way!
News link:
Link to Granada TV report, watch it then ask yourself: 'can we really trust the mass media to be impartial?' I think not!
http://www.itvlocal.com/granada/news/ On the right hand side of the page click on Granada news, then Granada Reports for Saturday 17 Nov 2007 (The report is about 4 Min's into the program).
One last point:
UAF supporters aren't really all 7' tall. The video was originally shot in wide screen, but in order to get it onto this blog I had to use the standard 4:3 aspect ratio.
Joint Preston & Lancaster meeting.
Last Thursday a joint meeting of Lancaster & Preston members and supporters took place in Preston. It is intended that this will be the first of regular joint meetings, held on alternative months in each city.This first meeting was well attended with almost 40 people, both members and supporters, braving the cold night air to attend. Cllr Paul Cromie from Bradford City Council was the main speaker of the night. Talking about his work as a councillor, and how despite a number of dirty, and total undemocratic, tricks from both UAF and the other parties, his wife Lynda was elected as the second BNP councillor in the ward a year after his own election.
From Paul’s talk it was clear that British National Party councillors, who buckle down to their grassroots ward work, are much preferred by the voters over the gravy train cronies put up by other parties.
Also present, at the meeting, was the BNP’s prospective candidate for the forthcoming Tulketh by-election in Preston, Mr Tony Bamber. This upcoming by-election, which is expected to be held in January, will be the first time we have stood a candidate in Preston since May 2006.
The meeting ended with a collection & raffle, which jointly raised almost £200 for local funds.
Late news!
Cllr Paul Cromie has, just last night, emailed the local Preston group with a promise of a £100 donation to the Tulketh by-election campaign. Just another example of Cllr Cromie’s total commitment to the survival of the British people.
A big thank you goes out to Paul from all members in both Preston & Lancaster. Well done (yet again) Paul!
Can you spot the odd man out?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Last week it was announced that: For the second year running, the British National Party’s national website had more visitors than all the other UK political web sites combined.
It was also revealed that the two eco-social groups most likely to visit the site, were from the more highly educated sector of the population, and the more deprived members of the working class.
Looking through the BNP’s site, it is easy to see why the first group would be attracted to it. While another story, covered widely in the press last week, may give a clue to why it attracts the latter. The current leader of the Labour party praised Margaret Thatcher, and welcomed her back into 10 Downing Street (Perhaps he plans to recruit yet another Tory adviser into his government).
The leader of a government which, before this one, had done more to destroy British industry than any in our history, was praised by the current New Labour Prime Minister, as a conviction politician. Is it any wonder then that working people are turning away from their old misguided loyalties towards the Labour party, and are now turning to the only real hope for all our people, the British National Party.
If Keir Hardie was alive today, I have no doubt that he would be standing shoulder to shoulder with Nick Griffin, to win back our nation. And as for a party leadership challenge: Nick Griffin ‘V’ Keir Hardie, now that would be an election worth voting in!
Finally the question: ‘who is the odd one out?’ well the obvious answer that it’s Nick Griffin, as both the others are brain dead, is wrong. The correct answer is Gordon Brown, as both the others have or had the best interests of working people at heart.
It was also revealed that the two eco-social groups most likely to visit the site, were from the more highly educated sector of the population, and the more deprived members of the working class.
Looking through the BNP’s site, it is easy to see why the first group would be attracted to it. While another story, covered widely in the press last week, may give a clue to why it attracts the latter. The current leader of the Labour party praised Margaret Thatcher, and welcomed her back into 10 Downing Street (Perhaps he plans to recruit yet another Tory adviser into his government).
The leader of a government which, before this one, had done more to destroy British industry than any in our history, was praised by the current New Labour Prime Minister, as a conviction politician. Is it any wonder then that working people are turning away from their old misguided loyalties towards the Labour party, and are now turning to the only real hope for all our people, the British National Party.
If Keir Hardie was alive today, I have no doubt that he would be standing shoulder to shoulder with Nick Griffin, to win back our nation. And as for a party leadership challenge: Nick Griffin ‘V’ Keir Hardie, now that would be an election worth voting in!
Finally the question: ‘who is the odd one out?’ well the obvious answer that it’s Nick Griffin, as both the others are brain dead, is wrong. The correct answer is Gordon Brown, as both the others have or had the best interests of working people at heart.
Nick Griffin, Chairman of the British National Party.
Result of the leadership election:
.
Nick Griffin..........91 %
Chris Jackson.........9 %
(Enough said I think)
.
Well Done Nick Griffin.
.
Now let's get on with the job of winning our Nation back!
BNP Leadership challenge.
A longtime party member, Chris Jackson, has announced that he is running for the leadership of the Party. Now personally I don’t think Chris Jackson is a bad bloke, and he has worked hard for the party in the past, but he is not a natural leader.In fact I’m afraid Chris has absolutely no leadership qualities at all. Now there’s nothing wrong with that, I consider myself to be just a good grassroots member, and one of this party’s strength is its affinity with the ordinary people of our Nation. But to flourish we also need a leader with talent and leadership qualities. The simple fact is: Nick Griffin has these qualities in abundance, while Chris Jackson lacks them completely.
Most members, I’ve spoke with lately, welcome this as a chance to show support for, and appreciation of, Nick’s leadership.
Undoubtedly Nick Griffin will win this election easily, but not because it’s a ‘shoe in’ as was the case in the labour leadership change a few days ago. Gordon Brown was chosen by his predecessor, in much the same way as the old Roman Empires chose their own successors, and such is the case in all fascist parties.
The British National Party leader is chosen by its grassroots members. People should ask themselves which is the real fascist party, New Labour or the BNP?
.
.
.
As always, the views expressed here should not to be taken as necessarily representing official British National Party policies.
.
Changing face of our towns & cities.
This is a (single sided A5) slip we used in our recent local election campaign here in Lancaster..
However, after reading it again, I think it could apply to many other towns and cities around our country.
.
It's also interesting to note that the United Nations backs the British people's fight for survival.
.
(Click on the image to enlarge it)
.
.
.
.
.
.
To see the full United Nation declaration on indigenous peoples human rights, click the link below:
UKIP, a party with its head in the sand.
While watching the video below two things struck me:
1. I totally agree with almost everything it says.
1. I totally agree with almost everything it says.
2. It totally fails to mention an even greater threat to our Nation, the ethnic invasion which has taken place on an unprecedented, and ever increasing, scale since the early 60’s.
Just shouting about the threat from a European super state is like making a fuss in 1940, about the threat from Italy, while totally ignoring the Germans.
Yes the EU is a threat to our Nation, and its people, but to defeat the EU just to hand our country over to Islamic control, would make any victory over the European super state meaningless.
UKIP is a party which is afraid to mention race, that is equivalent to being afraid to talk about the Nazi threat in 1940.
We the indigenous British people will (If nothing is done about it) be a minority in our own land by the year 2060, and simply defeating the threat from the EU will do nothing to prevent this.
The British National Party is the only party prepared to take on both the EU, and mass immigration , UKIP will not!
While watching the video think:
EU (2007) = Italy (1940)
Islam and mass immigration (2007) = Nazi Germany (1940).
To view the video click on the link below:
.
Lancaster's 'FASCIST SCAM’
Fascism (of the left wing sort that is) is alive and thriving on campus at Lancaster University.
The National student union organisation has, for a long time now, had a far left slant to its ruling body. A policy called no platform, which basically allows it to deny free speech to anyone they disagree with, has been introduced by some local student union branches, although not yet by LUSU (Lancaster University's Student Union).
This is of course the only action these left wing fascist can take when faced with reasoned debate, because they know they would lose in a free and open discussion of policies. Today the local student internet discussion forum removed my right of reply to postings made on its site, while allowing postings from someone called Squadism who uses the logo shown above.
The no platform policy is supposed to apply to fascists; the irony is they are the very people who impose it. As far as I understand it (and I’m no expert on fascism) one of the key tenets of fascism is to prevent a free and open discussion of the facts, that’s how they thrive!
Can I assure the people running Lancaster’s SCAM forum, your fascist censorship will not in any way stop, or hinder, the growth of the British National Party in Lancaster.
SCAM really is an appropriate name for a discussion forum which denies the right of reply, ‘FASCIST SCAM’ even more so. .
The National student union organisation has, for a long time now, had a far left slant to its ruling body. A policy called no platform, which basically allows it to deny free speech to anyone they disagree with, has been introduced by some local student union branches, although not yet by LUSU (Lancaster University's Student Union).
This is of course the only action these left wing fascist can take when faced with reasoned debate, because they know they would lose in a free and open discussion of policies. Today the local student internet discussion forum removed my right of reply to postings made on its site, while allowing postings from someone called Squadism who uses the logo shown above.
The no platform policy is supposed to apply to fascists; the irony is they are the very people who impose it. As far as I understand it (and I’m no expert on fascism) one of the key tenets of fascism is to prevent a free and open discussion of the facts, that’s how they thrive!
Can I assure the people running Lancaster’s SCAM forum, your fascist censorship will not in any way stop, or hinder, the growth of the British National Party in Lancaster.
SCAM really is an appropriate name for a discussion forum which denies the right of reply, ‘FASCIST SCAM’ even more so. .
A statement about this blog.
All local BNP groups and branches have been asked by head office, to make it clear that their local blogs are unofficial, and that the views expressed in them do not necessarily represent official British National Party polices.
This Lancaster & Morecambe blog was originally set up to provide an alternative discussion forum to the local UAF site, which like all such fascist organisations, denies the right of a reasoned reply to its postings. This original purpose has now been expanded to include coverage of the local group’s activities, and during elections will provide a platform for our local candidates.
Local blogs have a great future in the arena of democratic politics, providing local members with an internet presence, and allowing local people to find out about the local activities of the party. While each local blog on its own can have only a tinny effect at the national level, the combined effects of each local site, when put together, is potentially massive. But it must be stressed that these are not official British National Party sites.
For the best political site on the web, including news and views from official party sources, visit the party’s official web site at: http://www.bnp.org.uk/ .
This Lancaster & Morecambe blog was originally set up to provide an alternative discussion forum to the local UAF site, which like all such fascist organisations, denies the right of a reasoned reply to its postings. This original purpose has now been expanded to include coverage of the local group’s activities, and during elections will provide a platform for our local candidates.
Local blogs have a great future in the arena of democratic politics, providing local members with an internet presence, and allowing local people to find out about the local activities of the party. While each local blog on its own can have only a tinny effect at the national level, the combined effects of each local site, when put together, is potentially massive. But it must be stressed that these are not official British National Party sites.
For the best political site on the web, including news and views from official party sources, visit the party’s official web site at: http://www.bnp.org.uk/ .
Lancaster BNP vote for 2006 & 2007
A true indication of voters support for the British National Party is shown here.
Total people voting for the BNP
June '06........... 220
Dec '06............. 93
May '07........... 297
Average vote in 2006 was 156
.
increase in vote in 2007 297/156 = 1.9
representing a 90% increase in support this year, FANTASTIC!
Mr Osswoski's abacus needs new batteries.
Lancaster UAF's very own Ketlan Osswoski may well have an O level in fashion & design (see his photo on this page), but when it comes to a mathematical analysis of election results he gets a big ZERO out of ten. Unable to find the battery compartment on his old abacus, for his blog's latest posting he has now had to resort to counting on his fingers. This has unfortunately limited his numbering ability to 10 or less.
Just to help him out a bit, the calculations go like this:
Total people voting in the Skerton West election =1399 (announced at the count earlier today, but not published on the council's web site).
Total people casting a voting for the British National Party = 297
Percentage of the voters who supported the BNP this time is 297/1399 = 21.2%
Just to help him out a bit, the calculations go like this:
Total people voting in the Skerton West election =1399 (announced at the count earlier today, but not published on the council's web site).
Total people casting a voting for the British National Party = 297
Percentage of the voters who supported the BNP this time is 297/1399 = 21.2%
Yesterday's vote as a % of our December’s by-election vote: 297/93 =319%
That is more than 3 times the vote we got last December, a great result by any standard.
As for the abacus Ketlan, it may be mains powered why not try sitting in the bath and playing with a couple of wires from a live plug.
NO KETLAN DON’T, I WAS ONLY JOKING THAT’S DANGEROUS!
As for the abacus Ketlan, it may be mains powered why not try sitting in the bath and playing with a couple of wires from a live plug.
NO KETLAN DON’T, I WAS ONLY JOKING THAT’S DANGEROUS!
.
Don’t worry folks! Ketlan hasn’t sat in a bath for years, and certainly won’t know how to use the taps.
BNP vote increased over 219%in less than 5 months.
With 21.2% of the voters in Skerton West voting BNP yesterday, the 219% increase in our vote can only be called fantastic.
In last December’s Skerton West by-election, the British National Party’s share of the vote was 93. Yesterday 297 people turned out and voted BNP, that’s an incredible 219% increase in less than 5 months.
Now readers who remember the December by-election may also remember my description of our campaign as being low key, and so it was. For a more down to earth analysis we need to average our vote over the last two by-elections in the ward (June & December ’07). The total vote in both was 220+93=313 giving an average vote of just over 156.
Now comparing yesterday’s 297 with this average gives 297/156 shows a more realistic 90% increase in our vote, still an exceptionally good result by any standards.
Also what might be called the ‘icing on the cake’ for the local group, was our defeat of the Green Party’s candidate. The Greens won many seats in the city from Labour yesterday, including unthroning the leader of the council Ian Barker. They were however unable to beat the British National Party in a seat where environmental issues are the number one local concern on the doorstep.
The local British National Party still has a lot of hard work to do in Lancaster, but the ground has now been cleared, and the day when it’s the BNP who are defeating the Labour leader in the city must now be just that little bit closer.
In last December’s Skerton West by-election, the British National Party’s share of the vote was 93. Yesterday 297 people turned out and voted BNP, that’s an incredible 219% increase in less than 5 months.
Now readers who remember the December by-election may also remember my description of our campaign as being low key, and so it was. For a more down to earth analysis we need to average our vote over the last two by-elections in the ward (June & December ’07). The total vote in both was 220+93=313 giving an average vote of just over 156.
Now comparing yesterday’s 297 with this average gives 297/156 shows a more realistic 90% increase in our vote, still an exceptionally good result by any standards.
Also what might be called the ‘icing on the cake’ for the local group, was our defeat of the Green Party’s candidate. The Greens won many seats in the city from Labour yesterday, including unthroning the leader of the council Ian Barker. They were however unable to beat the British National Party in a seat where environmental issues are the number one local concern on the doorstep.
The local British National Party still has a lot of hard work to do in Lancaster, but the ground has now been cleared, and the day when it’s the BNP who are defeating the Labour leader in the city must now be just that little bit closer.
.
Report on the final week of our election campaign.
Canvassing has been going well, and it is clear New Labour will be punished severely by the voters for the dreadful way they have treated ordinary British citizens.
.
Issues being brought up on doorsteps include the war in Iraq and, not surprisingly, the issue of cheap European immigrant labour dragging down wages, and taking jobs from local people. This is not an issue of race, the immigrants concerned are manly Polish or Eastern Europeans such as Romanians.
Surprisingly, local issues seem to be playing very little part in the voter's intentions. The one exception being a proposed bypass road, in the very North West of the ward.
It is also clear that the main opposition party, at a National level, has been unable to attract disgruntled voters. And with a much more active election campaign, than in the by-election last December, the British National Party is set to win a very greatly increased vote from that achieved just five months ago.
Surprisingly, local issues seem to be playing very little part in the voter's intentions. The one exception being a proposed bypass road, in the very North West of the ward.
It is also clear that the main opposition party, at a National level, has been unable to attract disgruntled voters. And with a much more active election campaign, than in the by-election last December, the British National Party is set to win a very greatly increased vote from that achieved just five months ago.
.
It is now becoming clear that a British National Party candidate, can change voter apathy into a positive vote for a truly patriotic party.
The British National Party giving voters a real chose.
The British National Party giving voters a real chose.
Election update.
The Lancaster & Morecambe group delivered almost 500 individual addressed electoral communications yesterday. Registered postal voters, who received these letters, will be getting their voting slips in the post on Monday morning. Putting these letters out yesterday, give the voters the weekend to consider, our solutions too, the most relevant issues of the campaign.
Further individually addressed letters will be delivered to regular (on the day) voters late on in the campaign. More details of the planned campaign, if published here, would only give our opponents a greater insight into our election strategy, but rest assured this site will keep readers updated as soon as possible.
Further individually addressed letters will be delivered to regular (on the day) voters late on in the campaign. More details of the planned campaign, if published here, would only give our opponents a greater insight into our election strategy, but rest assured this site will keep readers updated as soon as possible.
Further to my last posting.
This is a photograph that I’ve lifted from the RedWatch site. Now you have to ask yourself, what possible threat do these ladies pose to anyone?
I think it was Joseph Stalin who said: I may or may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it!
Or was it Joe McCarthy?
Redwatch was warned!
When I included a photo of Ketlan Ossowski on this site, I also included a warning on the photo itself. That warning stated that I held the copyright, and would back any attempt to stop its unauthorised use. Well today it turns out RedWatch has decided to ignore my warning, and publish the photo on their nasty little site.
Now Ossowski may be a threat to our democratic way of life, but as far as I know he has never actually engaged in violence, and so should not appear on a site such as RedWatch. I originally published his picture in response to a picture of Nick Griffin that appeared on the Lancaster UAF site. Both Nick Griffin and Ketlan Ossowski are public figures (unlike Simone Clarke), so must expect to have their photos published. Being the chairman of a legitimate and registered political party makes Nick Griffin a public figure, likewise Ossowski gives press interviews as a UAF spokesman and therefore he also must be regarded as a public figure, all be it a ludicrous one .
I have today emailed Osswoski to offer my full support in any action he may wish to take against the editors of the RedWatch site. Not because I think Ossowski’s ugly mug deserves special protection, but because the RedWatch site regularly includes pictures of little old ladies protesting against US bases, and student demonstrating against road widening schemes. Therefore, like UAF itself, RedWatch has no part to play in a democratic system.
Now Ossowski may be a threat to our democratic way of life, but as far as I know he has never actually engaged in violence, and so should not appear on a site such as RedWatch. I originally published his picture in response to a picture of Nick Griffin that appeared on the Lancaster UAF site. Both Nick Griffin and Ketlan Ossowski are public figures (unlike Simone Clarke), so must expect to have their photos published. Being the chairman of a legitimate and registered political party makes Nick Griffin a public figure, likewise Ossowski gives press interviews as a UAF spokesman and therefore he also must be regarded as a public figure, all be it a ludicrous one .
I have today emailed Osswoski to offer my full support in any action he may wish to take against the editors of the RedWatch site. Not because I think Ossowski’s ugly mug deserves special protection, but because the RedWatch site regularly includes pictures of little old ladies protesting against US bases, and student demonstrating against road widening schemes. Therefore, like UAF itself, RedWatch has no part to play in a democratic system.
Local BNP’s flying start - leads UAF to start lying.
Ok that’s quite a corny title and also possibly a misleading one, as it may lead our readers to believe UAF lying is a new state of affairs, it’s not! UAF spreading lies is in fact quite normal. It also regularly denies the right of reply to articles and other reader’s comments.
One of their latest postings is unusual in one respect only, no it’s not truthful (now that would be a first), but it is at least home-grown and not one of their usual cut and paste jobs.
This latest rant refers to me (Chris Hill) no less than 17 times. Now it would take me a long time to point out all the misleading rubbish and downright lies in those 970 words. So I’ll correct only one, then post a copy of a reply I posted a few days ago. But don’t bother looking for it on their site they didn’t publish it.
The one correction I will make first is their contention that I’m from Bradford, I’m not! I was born and brought up in Lancashire, only moving to London to get work when I was 18. I did stand as a BNP candidate in Bradford four years ago, but moved back to Lancaster a few months later, after being made redundant.
Anyway I’ve an election to fight, so here’s that comment UAF refused to post, and I’ll leave it at that for the moment.
Dear antifascist,
Neither Copeland or Laidlaw were ever BNP members that's a facts, live with it!
The BNP did not claim Cottage had not been a member, just that he was not a member at the time, but so what anyway? So far, the only thing he has pleaded guilty to, is possession of cleaning chemicals, on all other charges he is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
As for other UAF lies, I’d be here till well after the May elections if I recalled them all (that’s the May 2011 elections). So here are just three;
1.
Paul Cromie tried to buy votes.
UAF lies again: Paul is an honest hard working councillor, who made a Christmas gift (totalling over £1000) to some of the most deserved in our society. Well-done Cllr Cromie.
2.
At the BNP annual conference, in Blackpool last November, conference attendees abused UAF demonstrators.
More UAF lies, the hotel's own security manager confirmed that there was no contact between demonstrators and any of our members at the conference. Not to mention your distortion of numbers involved in the conference. The Maximum possible capacity of 250 attended (fire regulations), but UAF lied putting the number at only 40-50, while their claim of around 200 demonstrators was in realty about 35-40.
3.
Andy Sykes is a decent honourable guy.
This guy went on national TV and admitted he had denied many thousands of voters in Bradford a chance to vote for the party of their chose. If I remember he said something along the lines of: ‘I’ve stopped five or six BNP candidates standing, so I’ve done my job well.’
In my opinion Sykes is a threat to democracy, and he’s as good as admitted it on National TV.
Well as I say I could go on almost indefinitely, but I said three so I’ll stop at those.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
One of their latest postings is unusual in one respect only, no it’s not truthful (now that would be a first), but it is at least home-grown and not one of their usual cut and paste jobs.
This latest rant refers to me (Chris Hill) no less than 17 times. Now it would take me a long time to point out all the misleading rubbish and downright lies in those 970 words. So I’ll correct only one, then post a copy of a reply I posted a few days ago. But don’t bother looking for it on their site they didn’t publish it.
The one correction I will make first is their contention that I’m from Bradford, I’m not! I was born and brought up in Lancashire, only moving to London to get work when I was 18. I did stand as a BNP candidate in Bradford four years ago, but moved back to Lancaster a few months later, after being made redundant.
Anyway I’ve an election to fight, so here’s that comment UAF refused to post, and I’ll leave it at that for the moment.
Dear antifascist,
Neither Copeland or Laidlaw were ever BNP members that's a facts, live with it!
The BNP did not claim Cottage had not been a member, just that he was not a member at the time, but so what anyway? So far, the only thing he has pleaded guilty to, is possession of cleaning chemicals, on all other charges he is entitled to the presumption of innocence.
As for other UAF lies, I’d be here till well after the May elections if I recalled them all (that’s the May 2011 elections). So here are just three;
1.
Paul Cromie tried to buy votes.
UAF lies again: Paul is an honest hard working councillor, who made a Christmas gift (totalling over £1000) to some of the most deserved in our society. Well-done Cllr Cromie.
2.
At the BNP annual conference, in Blackpool last November, conference attendees abused UAF demonstrators.
More UAF lies, the hotel's own security manager confirmed that there was no contact between demonstrators and any of our members at the conference. Not to mention your distortion of numbers involved in the conference. The Maximum possible capacity of 250 attended (fire regulations), but UAF lied putting the number at only 40-50, while their claim of around 200 demonstrators was in realty about 35-40.
3.
Andy Sykes is a decent honourable guy.
This guy went on national TV and admitted he had denied many thousands of voters in Bradford a chance to vote for the party of their chose. If I remember he said something along the lines of: ‘I’ve stopped five or six BNP candidates standing, so I’ve done my job well.’
In my opinion Sykes is a threat to democracy, and he’s as good as admitted it on National TV.
Well as I say I could go on almost indefinitely, but I said three so I’ll stop at those.
From
Chris Hill
(Lancaster)
News from the Lancaster & Morecambe local elections.
The first of our local nominations (Skerton West Ward) was accepted, by the election office of Lancaster & Morecambe council, yesterday afternoon. And over the last week this same ward has been completely leafleted, with the first of our warm up leaflets.
Initial canvassing shows a good solid support, from the voters, for British National Party policies. It is this grassroots support that we will be building on over the next month as the campaign heats up. It is clear now that victory is only 30 days of hard work away.
The British National Party, representing the British people of Lancaster.
Initial canvassing shows a good solid support, from the voters, for British National Party policies. It is this grassroots support that we will be building on over the next month as the campaign heats up. It is clear now that victory is only 30 days of hard work away.
The British National Party, representing the British people of Lancaster.
Lancaster & Morecambe election update.
Lancaster and Morecambe British National Party’s local election campaign got off to a flying start this week, with canvassing and the collection of nomination signatures in three wards.
The local group’s Gold ward is Skerton West, but it is hoped that at least two other seats will be contested. Voters in these other wards, which have been designated as Silver, will get the chance to support candidates who are truly interested in British people. And with three votes to cast, voters who are traditionally very loyal to what they see as ‘their’ party, will have the chance to vote BNP while still not totally abandoning these old allegiances.
This blog will inevitably be updated less often than normal during this election period, but normal serves (as they say) will be resumed very soon afterwards.
The local group’s Gold ward is Skerton West, but it is hoped that at least two other seats will be contested. Voters in these other wards, which have been designated as Silver, will get the chance to support candidates who are truly interested in British people. And with three votes to cast, voters who are traditionally very loyal to what they see as ‘their’ party, will have the chance to vote BNP while still not totally abandoning these old allegiances.
This blog will inevitably be updated less often than normal during this election period, but normal serves (as they say) will be resumed very soon afterwards.
British National Party: heading to Victory in May’s local elections.
The Lancaster & Morecambe group is preparing for the upcoming local elections. This site will give weekly reports on our local campaign, as well as news from other groups in the North West area.
.
Independent election analysis, published in the Sunday Times yesterday (see link below), says the British National Party is set to make unprecedented electoral gains in those May elections, and it is the Lancaster group’s intention to add to those.
.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1496782.ece
.
Independent election analysis, published in the Sunday Times yesterday (see link below), says the British National Party is set to make unprecedented electoral gains in those May elections, and it is the Lancaster group’s intention to add to those.
.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1496782.ece
Notice of site intentions.
This blog was originally set up to provide a forum for critical analysis of the stories posted on the Lancaster UAF blog. That blog however has increasingly become a site which merely mirrors (cut and pastes) other peoples work, taken from other sites.
.
It has therefore been decided to restructure this blog as a newsletter, covering our local British National Party activities. With the upcoming local council election campaign, it is intended that this site will become a source of local news and information relevant to those elections.
.
On the very rare occasion when the UAF site does publishes, original work that warrants mention, we will of course carry such comments on them.
Lancaster UAF race-hate man guilty of shootings
The cut and paste illusionists of Lancaster UAF were at it again yesterday, doing what they do best, totally distorting the news.
In an article (taken, or should that be nicked, off a BBC news website), which has no connection with the British National Party, Lancaster UAF have decided to add there own little bit of bias to the story.
In an article (taken, or should that be nicked, off a BBC news website), which has no connection with the British National Party, Lancaster UAF have decided to add there own little bit of bias to the story.
.
The original title of the article was ‘Race-hate man guilty of shooting’ no connection there with the British National Party you might think, and of course you’d be right. But when cut and pasted into the Lancaster UAF blog, all of a sudden the letters BNP miraculously appear in the title.
Lancaster UAF: never letting the truth get in the way of a good story, even someone else’s good story.
Lancaster UAF: never letting the truth get in the way of a good story, even someone else’s good story.
.
Please Note.
.
Lancaster UAF have now changed the title of the story, on their blog, from ‘BNP Race-hate man guilty of shooting’. The new title is still not the original BBC one, and is clearly still meant to wrongfully discredit the party.
Lancaster UAF have now changed the title of the story, on their blog, from ‘BNP Race-hate man guilty of shooting’. The new title is still not the original BBC one, and is clearly still meant to wrongfully discredit the party.
Simone Clarke update.
I hope later this evening to have a first hand report on the Fascist UAF demonstration, that took place yesterday evening, out side the Dorchester Hotel in London. But while you’re waiting for that, why not send Simone a quick email of support at: simoneclarke36@hotmail.co.uk
(Keep emails short, as hopefully she’ll have a lot of them to read)
Standing up to fascism takes courage, but must be done!
(Keep emails short, as hopefully she’ll have a lot of them to read)
Standing up to fascism takes courage, but must be done!
Once again well done Simone.
.
Further update:
The demonstration was apparently an even bigger flop than the last one. Reports give the number attending as less than a dozen UAF scruffs. So it has been decided that it warrants no further mention here.
Lancaster's UAF Fascists are at it again.
Regular readers of this blog, will know the contempt that I feel for the ironically named UAF organisation, and its fascist ridden offshoot here in Lancaster. .
However Last week's (cut and paste) posting on the Lancaster UAF blog, calling for yet another witch hunt against, the English National Ballet’s principle dancer, Simone Clarke has shocked even me.
.
The full story can be read in the posting directly below this one, which has been moved up from an earlier date. Although both the English National Ballet, and her own union, say she has broken neither organisations rules by choosing to take up the democratic right of every citizen to join a political party, UAF are still calling for her sacking!
.
Their protest last month saw around 20, scruffy protesting fascist’s, turn up outside a London theatre where Simone was appearing. That protest was an almighty embarrassing flop, for the UAF organisation. Despite this however, UAF is continuing its campaign of intimidation against Simone. They are planning to demonstrate outside an ENB fundraising event later this month.
.
This continuing harassment must surely be one of the most undemocratic, and hypocritical, actions that any UK based fascist group has attempted during this present century.
.
You can e-mail Simone with a quick supportive message at; simoneclarke36@hotmail.co.uk .
.
To see a video of Simone dancing, click on the link below. http://nationalistblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/bnp-ballerina-in-action.html
Simone Clarke's story & UAF's shame!
Simone Clarke is a principle dancer with the English National Ballet, she is also a British National Party member. Now most people at this point will say ‘so what! we’re a free country aren’t we?' Well whether we’re a free country or not is debatable, certainly we won’t be if UAF have their way. Returning to Ms Clarke now, last month she danced the principal roll in the ballet ‘Giselle’ at a London theatre. This was her first appearance since the Guardian newspaper violated her right to privacy, and a free political viewpoint, by revealing her membership of the British National Party just before Christmas last month.The Fascist organisation, and ridiculously hypocritically named, United Against Fascism don’t agree that democracy means respecting a person’s right to join or support any party they wish, without being subjected to intimidation. Or it may be they do accept this, but just don’t like our democratic way of life, one can only guess at their reasons.Anyway they (UAF) decided to organise a mass demonstration outside the theatre, were Ms Clarke was dancing, on Friday afternoon. They pronounced on their websites that they expected at least a hundred demonstrators to turn up.Well newspaper reports tell of twenty protestors (it should be noted that the media always overestimate UAF numbers as a mater of NUJ policy). While no counter demonstration was organised, a party of 'new' BNP ballet fans from the London area did attend the performance.By all accounts the ballet was a great success, with Simone receiving a standing ovation for her performance, and just maybe for her brave stance against intimidation as well.This is not the end of Simone’s battle with the UAF fascist, they will continue to use dishonest and snide methods to get her sacked. But where ever UAF shows it’s ugly face, the BNP’s members and supporters will be right there as well, standing up against them. Our ancestors fought, for hundreds of years, to get a democratic say in the running of our nation, and no scruffy fascist UAF member is going to take that away from us.Dance on with pride Simone.
Lancaster BNP members help out at Burnley by-election.
Despite a desperate attempt by the UAF organisation and the three main political parties, to muddy the waters with inaccurate and irrelevant slurs, the British National Party yesterday won 538 votes (27.1%) in a Burnley council by-election.
Paul McDevitt, standing for the British National Party, beat candidates from the Labour and Conservative parties to secure second place. The by-election was caused by the death, late last year, of the sitting Labour councillor.
A car full of members from Lancaster BNP drove over to Burnley early yesterday morning, and spent much of the day manning polling stations and reminding people to vote. Driving back to Lancaster, before the result was announced, it was clear the response we had received from voters was very positive, and the result was going to be close.
In the end smear leaflets full of lies and half truths, from the three other parties and UAF, distracted voter enough to deny the British National Party an outright victory. But with over 500 voters, already backing the party in the ward, the prospect of Brunshaw voters returning a British National Party councillor this May, must now be a very real one.
Paul McDevitt, standing for the British National Party, beat candidates from the Labour and Conservative parties to secure second place. The by-election was caused by the death, late last year, of the sitting Labour councillor.
A car full of members from Lancaster BNP drove over to Burnley early yesterday morning, and spent much of the day manning polling stations and reminding people to vote. Driving back to Lancaster, before the result was announced, it was clear the response we had received from voters was very positive, and the result was going to be close.
In the end smear leaflets full of lies and half truths, from the three other parties and UAF, distracted voter enough to deny the British National Party an outright victory. But with over 500 voters, already backing the party in the ward, the prospect of Brunshaw voters returning a British National Party councillor this May, must now be a very real one.
.
Full Brunshaw results ;
.
LibDem = 875
BNP =538
Labour =479
Tory =90
Lancaster's UAF latest nonesense.
For the Lancaster UAF blog to post anything other than an article, which has been cut and pasted from another sites, is a rare occurrence. However just such an article was posted yesterday.
That article entitled ‘Sharon Ebanks NNP launches attack on BNP's Great White Records’ is a blatant attempt at stirring up trouble, where none exists, in the desperate hope of splitting a party which is now united as never before.
Using quotes, from postings on an extreme political forum, by a disgruntled ex member of the British National Party (Sharon Ebanks), it tries unsuccessfully to incite discontent within a united membership. The allegations made in that article are no more than a revamp of old, and totally discredited, allegations that they have been peddling for years. The only new thing here is how they managed to persuade Ebanks into repeating their nonsense, on a laughable forum such as Stormfront.
So ridiculous is the story, it can be successfully refuted in just one sentence. The British National Party’s accounts (unlike those of UAF itself) are audited by the Electoral Commission, and there has never been so much as a penny unaccounted for!
Then, after the Electoral Commission audits the accounts, they are made public online for anyone to study. One might ask, why aren’t the UAF accounts subjected to the same openness, do they have something to hide?
This site has, on occasions, called for the Lancaster UAF blog to end their cut and paste culture, and produce home-grown articles for their site. If however; this latest nonsense is the best they can do, then maybe we were wrong, and they should stick to cut and pasting other peoples work.
The British National Party, united together under Nick Griffin's leadership, going forward to victory at the local elections this May.
.
Further to the above:
It’s been pointed out that; technically the audit is carried out by an accredited firm of accountants, then passed on to the Electoral Commission for its approval.
Lancaster UAF roll out new site
The fascist organisation Lancaster UAF, whose hatred of democracy is legendary, unveiled their new blog last week. But despite a promise to include more original articles, the new site just seems to be a continuation of the old cut and paste banal trivia we have come to expect over the last 2 years or so.
It’s not clear yet whether they will continue the censorship of any critical comment, however valid and justified they may be. It was the implementation of that censorship policy which sparked the launch of this site, as a means of reply to their postings.
However looking over the stories pasted to that site over the last week, reveals nothing worth commenting on. So this site will be branching out to include information and details of our local activities and events. And with the full council elections now less that 3 months away, reports will be coming in quick and fast. Watch this space as they say!
It’s not clear yet whether they will continue the censorship of any critical comment, however valid and justified they may be. It was the implementation of that censorship policy which sparked the launch of this site, as a means of reply to their postings.
However looking over the stories pasted to that site over the last week, reveals nothing worth commenting on. So this site will be branching out to include information and details of our local activities and events. And with the full council elections now less that 3 months away, reports will be coming in quick and fast. Watch this space as they say!
Now all the fuss has died down, lets keep up or support for Simone.
.
The fuss about Simone Clarke’s membership, of the British National Party, seems to have died away. And now that her union (Equity) has promised to support her right to a free political opinion, it may well be that the whole disgraceful incident will be forgotten. This I’m sure is what Simone would want, after all it was not her chose to make her membership public in the first place.
Simone's full story can be read in postings below, on this site.
I am sure however, that a continuing steady stream of private e-mails to Simone, offering our continuing support, would still give her a boost.
A quick supportive E-mail to: Simoneclarke36@hotmail.co.uk just saying how proud you are of the way she has stood up to the fascists would, I’m sure, be appreciated. I would suggests not contacting the ENB now, as the faster this fuss dies down, the better for Simone. She is, after all, a professional ballet dancer not a professional BNP member.
Dance on with pride Simone.
The fuss about Simone Clarke’s membership, of the British National Party, seems to have died away. And now that her union (Equity) has promised to support her right to a free political opinion, it may well be that the whole disgraceful incident will be forgotten. This I’m sure is what Simone would want, after all it was not her chose to make her membership public in the first place.
Simone's full story can be read in postings below, on this site.
I am sure however, that a continuing steady stream of private e-mails to Simone, offering our continuing support, would still give her a boost.
A quick supportive E-mail to: Simoneclarke36@hotmail.co.uk just saying how proud you are of the way she has stood up to the fascists would, I’m sure, be appreciated. I would suggests not contacting the ENB now, as the faster this fuss dies down, the better for Simone. She is, after all, a professional ballet dancer not a professional BNP member.
Dance on with pride Simone.
As a Home office minister asks judges not to jail criminals. We ask; ‘is this to make more space for political prisoners’
Many of our National newspapers yesterday, carried headlines about a call from a Home Office minister to judges, to jail only the most violent and persistent offenders. Now for the benefit of our foreign readers, I should explain, the Home Office is the government department responsible for all law and order issues in England and Wales. The reason for the call; well quite simply our jail are totally full.
This alone would be a terrible state of affairs, but when one also considers the refusal of the government to release a totally innocent man convicted on trumped up charges it becomes almost criminal.
Kevin Hughes is a man currently serving a 2 year prisons sentence for a crime, that not only did he not commit, but in fact never occurred in the first place. Mr Hughes was convicted on the sole word of a twice failed asylum seeker, who accused him of assault. No marks, no bruises, no witnesses, no evidence of any sort except the word of a man who had already shown his contempt for our laws by refusing to leave the country when told to do so. The police dropped all charges against Kevin twice, only to reinstate them on the insistence of government officials. Why would senior government officials bother about such a nonsense case; the answer I’m afraid is political. Kevin Hughes is a man of previously impeccable character; he is also a senior British National Party member in the Midlands.
At this point many readers will be saying, “oh come on that sort of thing doesn’t happen in England, OK maybe in Russia or Mexico, but not in England”, well I’m afraid it does! I have myself been arrested twice while taking part in totally legal political activities. I was lucky however after I complained, the police admitted wrongful arrest in one case, and are about (or so I believe) to do the same in the other. Mr Hughes was not so lucky!
Kevin Hughe’s story can be seen at; http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=973
This is just more evidence to support the contention that; new labour is more interested in filling jails with its political opponents, than it is with the rule of law.
This alone would be a terrible state of affairs, but when one also considers the refusal of the government to release a totally innocent man convicted on trumped up charges it becomes almost criminal.
Kevin Hughes is a man currently serving a 2 year prisons sentence for a crime, that not only did he not commit, but in fact never occurred in the first place. Mr Hughes was convicted on the sole word of a twice failed asylum seeker, who accused him of assault. No marks, no bruises, no witnesses, no evidence of any sort except the word of a man who had already shown his contempt for our laws by refusing to leave the country when told to do so. The police dropped all charges against Kevin twice, only to reinstate them on the insistence of government officials. Why would senior government officials bother about such a nonsense case; the answer I’m afraid is political. Kevin Hughes is a man of previously impeccable character; he is also a senior British National Party member in the Midlands.
At this point many readers will be saying, “oh come on that sort of thing doesn’t happen in England, OK maybe in Russia or Mexico, but not in England”, well I’m afraid it does! I have myself been arrested twice while taking part in totally legal political activities. I was lucky however after I complained, the police admitted wrongful arrest in one case, and are about (or so I believe) to do the same in the other. Mr Hughes was not so lucky!
Kevin Hughe’s story can be seen at; http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=973
This is just more evidence to support the contention that; new labour is more interested in filling jails with its political opponents, than it is with the rule of law.
New labour, rotten to the core!
An explanation of why we sometimes have to censors the comments made on this site.
Freedom of speech is, in many countries, taken for granted as a right of every free citizen, as it was in the UK until a few years ago.
However laws made by both the UK government, and the EU state, mean that citizens of the UK, along with our European neighbours, can be imprisoned for speaking out against current government doctrine.
Many of our US visitors may be shocked, or even disbelieving at this statement, but I’m afraid it’s true! In the modern world’s mother of democracy (apologise to our Greek visitors, but I did say modern) Great Britain, we no longer have a right to (non-violent) freedom of speech.
However laws made by both the UK government, and the EU state, mean that citizens of the UK, along with our European neighbours, can be imprisoned for speaking out against current government doctrine.
Many of our US visitors may be shocked, or even disbelieving at this statement, but I’m afraid it’s true! In the modern world’s mother of democracy (apologise to our Greek visitors, but I did say modern) Great Britain, we no longer have a right to (non-violent) freedom of speech.
Now I agree that people who preach violence must be stopped, there freedom of speech must give way to the rights of people to live free from fear.
However, that is not what we are talking about here in the UK when we talk of government restrictions on free speech. People have been convicted in our courts of telling immigrants to ‘go home’ during heated arguments, no violence there, but a criminal conviction results non the less.
However, that is not what we are talking about here in the UK when we talk of government restrictions on free speech. People have been convicted in our courts of telling immigrants to ‘go home’ during heated arguments, no violence there, but a criminal conviction results non the less.
.
A British citizen has just spent a year in an Austrian jail for saying he does not believe that the Nazis killed millions of innocent people during Worlds War 2. So OK he's stupid! But surely the way to deal with such people is to show them up as such, in a free and open discussion, not to jail them for their stupidity.
So we ask our foreign readers to understand when we edit comments, it is not that this site wants to suppress free speech (it does not), but until there is no alternative to jail, the editors of this site want to avoid it. But be aware when the chose comes, shout up or be jailed, we will chose jail.
Give me liberty or give me death!
So we ask our foreign readers to understand when we edit comments, it is not that this site wants to suppress free speech (it does not), but until there is no alternative to jail, the editors of this site want to avoid it. But be aware when the chose comes, shout up or be jailed, we will chose jail.
Give me liberty or give me death!
A must see video 'islamification of Britain'
Ever everyone in Britain should see this.
Click below to view.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1qmFEujEtk
UKIP members should realise that islam is just as big a threat, to our way of life, as the European single state is. What would it benefit us to retrieve sovereignty from the European fascists, just to be turned into an islamic state.
There is only one solution, the British National Party.
(Thanks to the Barnsley Nationalist web site, for bringing this video to our attention.)
I have left the posting below from ‘religion of pieces’ in place because; I think it is an honest attempt at analysing parts of the Islamic faith.
However there are now very tight constraints on free speech in the UK, and although this does not cross the line, it comes as close as I’d like to get to it here. We all know the truth about islam, but remember if you put the truth in print you could well go to prison.
Nick Griffin was put through two trials before a Jury decided he did not cross the line with his very reasoned, total justified, criticism of islam .
As nothing below incites hatred or violence, towards muslims, I'm happy to leave it on the comments section of my blog. The way to defeat the Islamic threat is through a logical and reasoned debate. And although islam is an evil and wicked faith, muslims are the victums of islam, and it is they who suffer most from it's teachings. Pity muslims, but do not hate them.
Further to the above the posting from ‘Dr. Abdullah Azzaam’ appears (at least as far as I can tell) to be from an actual muslim, rather than someone pretending to be so. I’m going to leave it for two reasons, free speech means he is entitled to be heard, and to show the real threat that this islamic faith is to our way of life.
An update on the Simone Clarke story.
Simone Clarke is a principle dancer with the English National Ballet, she is also a British National Party member. Now most people at this point will say ‘so what! we’re a free country aren’t we?' Well whether we’re a free country or not is debatable, certainly we won’t be if UAF have their way. Returning to Ms Clarke now, on Friday afternoon she danced the principal roll in the ballet ‘Giselle’ at a London theatre. This was her first appearance since the Guardian newspaper violated her right to privacy, and a free and unintimidated political viewpoint, by revealing her membership of the British National Party just before Christmas last month.
The Fascist organisation, and ridiculously hypocritically named, United Against Fascism don’t agree that democracy means respecting a person’s right to join or support any party they wish, without being subjected to intimidation. Or it may be they do accept this, but just don’t like our democratic way of life, one can only guess at their reasons.
Anyway they (UAF) decided to organise a mass demonstration outside the theatre, were Ms Clarke was dancing, on Friday afternoon. They pronounced on their websites that they expected at least a hundred demonstrators to turn up.
Well newspaper reports tell of twenty protestors (it should be noted that the media always overestimate UAF numbers as a mater of NUJ policy). While no counter demonstration was organised, a party of 'new' BNP ballet fans from the London area did attend the performance.
By all accounts the ballet was a great success, with Simone receiving a standing ovation for her performance, and just maybe for her brave stance against intimidation as well.
This is not the end of Simone’s battle with the UAF fascist, they will continue to use dishonest and snide methods to get her sacked. But where ever UAF shows it’s ugly face, the BNP’s members and supporters will be right there as well, standing up against them. Our ancestors fought, for hundreds of years, to get a democratic say in the running of our nation, and no scruffy fascist UAF member is going to take that away from us.
Dance on with pride Simone.
See the older posting, about this story, which I have brought up the page. Also please note that the request for email support is still very relevant.
The Fascist organisation, and ridiculously hypocritically named, United Against Fascism don’t agree that democracy means respecting a person’s right to join or support any party they wish, without being subjected to intimidation. Or it may be they do accept this, but just don’t like our democratic way of life, one can only guess at their reasons.
Anyway they (UAF) decided to organise a mass demonstration outside the theatre, were Ms Clarke was dancing, on Friday afternoon. They pronounced on their websites that they expected at least a hundred demonstrators to turn up.
Well newspaper reports tell of twenty protestors (it should be noted that the media always overestimate UAF numbers as a mater of NUJ policy). While no counter demonstration was organised, a party of 'new' BNP ballet fans from the London area did attend the performance.
By all accounts the ballet was a great success, with Simone receiving a standing ovation for her performance, and just maybe for her brave stance against intimidation as well.
This is not the end of Simone’s battle with the UAF fascist, they will continue to use dishonest and snide methods to get her sacked. But where ever UAF shows it’s ugly face, the BNP’s members and supporters will be right there as well, standing up against them. Our ancestors fought, for hundreds of years, to get a democratic say in the running of our nation, and no scruffy fascist UAF member is going to take that away from us.
Dance on with pride Simone.
See the older posting, about this story, which I have brought up the page. Also please note that the request for email support is still very relevant.
Intimidation.
.
Simone Clarke is a principle dancer with the English National Ballet. Last week the Guardian newspaper revealed she is also a British National Party Member. At the moment she must be going through a very tough time, and I’m sure a few emails of support would be appreciated. A short supportive email (include the word ‘support’ in the title) to Simone herself at yatsen@yschang.co.uk and a more substantial email to the English National Ballet at info@ballet.org.uk , asking them to pass your support on to Simone.
To see Simone dance click the link below, it's a video file well worth a viewing.
http://nationalistblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/bnp-ballerina-in-action.html
Simone Clarke is a principle dancer with the English National Ballet. Last week the Guardian newspaper revealed she is also a British National Party Member. At the moment she must be going through a very tough time, and I’m sure a few emails of support would be appreciated. A short supportive email (include the word ‘support’ in the title) to Simone herself at yatsen@yschang.co.uk and a more substantial email to the English National Ballet at info@ballet.org.uk , asking them to pass your support on to Simone.
To see Simone dance click the link below, it's a video file well worth a viewing.
http://nationalistblog.blogspot.com/2007/01/bnp-ballerina-in-action.html
Bradford’s BNP Cllr Cromie shows the Christmas spirit, while Lancaster UAF continues with their all year round hypocrisy!
Bradford's Telegraph and Argos newspaper carried two stories about Bradford councillors in tonight’s edition. The first was about a Lib-Dem councillor convicted of sexual child abuse, while the other was about a BNP councillor donating £1000 to Bradford pensioners. Guess which Councillor Lancaster UAF has chosen to condemn.That’s right, ignoring the story about a Lib-Dem councillor convicted of sexual child abuse, and told to expect a long prison sentence, Lancaster UAF has run the story of Cllr Cromie's £1000 Christmas gift. Now while I do agree that, given the regularity with which Lib-Dem councillors are convicted of this type of offence, the Lib-Dem story is not particularly newsworthy. I do think it rates far above (at least in news terms) a generous gesture of £1000 to pensioners.
But UAF’s hypocrisy doesn’t stop there; the article then goes on to criticise Cllr Cromie for making a Christmas gift to some of the most needy in our society. The twisted logic goes something like this; although voting is secret, Cllr Cromie’s gift may have been an attempt to bribe pensioners into voting for him, when he next comes up for election, in 3 ½ years time. WHAT TOTAL RUBBISH!
Councillor Paul Cromie is a good friend of mine, who I know very well. He has been donating money to local good causes in Bradford for over 25 years, and I can say without hesitation that this is nothing more than a generous donation from a very generous man.
One final thought; the comment section of the Lancaster UAF blog (which incidentally bans all reasoned and logical criticism of its site) has had a comment posted on it, to the effect that Cllr Cromie is unpopular with the grassroots membership in Bradford. The truth is in fact the exact opposite. I lived in the West Yorkshire area for 2 years from 2001 to 2003, and was an active member in the Bradford Branch during that time. I know from my time in Bradford that, Paul Cromie is in fact terrifically respected, and liked, by the local membership in the Branch.
Lampooning a senior Lancaster UAF official. (Or have you seen my impression of a Pit-Bull Terrier?)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Last week I emailed a senior Lancaster UAF member, Ketlan Ossowski, asking him to remove a photograph of a ballet dancer with Nick Griffin’s face pasted on it, from the Lancaster UAF blog. His response was that people who put themselves in the public eye must, as a matter of course, be prepared to be lampooned by the media. This I now accept is indeed the case. Senior members of any organisation, who choose to make their membership public must take this in their stride.
Now here’s the payback for Mr Ossowski, the photo I took of him after being threatened a few years ago.
Mr Osswoski’s version, of what happened that day, can be found at the Lancaster UAF blog, my version is set out in a posting on this site below. I have now decided to publish that picture, unaltered, as I think it needs none in order to lampoon him.
Ask yourself, does this look like a man who has just made a reasonable request asking me to leave the march, or does it confirm my version of events that day?
I made a complaint to the police about Mr Ossowski behaviour that day. The police interviewed him, and I was later informed by the police that he had admitted threatening me, and had been warned about his behaviour.
Now here’s the payback for Mr Ossowski, the photo I took of him after being threatened a few years ago.
Mr Osswoski’s version, of what happened that day, can be found at the Lancaster UAF blog, my version is set out in a posting on this site below. I have now decided to publish that picture, unaltered, as I think it needs none in order to lampoon him.
Ask yourself, does this look like a man who has just made a reasonable request asking me to leave the march, or does it confirm my version of events that day?
I made a complaint to the police about Mr Ossowski behaviour that day. The police interviewed him, and I was later informed by the police that he had admitted threatening me, and had been warned about his behaviour.
.
Please note.
If the RedWatch site re-publishes this photo, I will back any attempt by UAF to close them down for copyright violations.
Comments on Lancaster UAF’s review (crazed rant) of this site.
First can I start with a thank you to the UAF reviewer, for pointing out a small grammatical error in the title, this has now been corrected. The review then goes on to say that I fit into the standard BNP mould. Well yes, I would like to think I do, honest decent and trustworthy like the overwhelming majority of British National Party members. Now that’s the correct and truthful part of the UAF review covered, so I’ll move on the rest of UAF's crazed rant.
They clamed I attended a Mayday march, in 2004, wearing a large rosette. this is simply a lie! I wore no badges or rosette of any kind that day, and attended the march as a member of an affiliated TUC organisation, as I had every right to do. Neither did I start taking photos of others on the march, again a Lancaster UAF lie. I took only one photograph that day, and this was after I had been recognised as a British National Party member by someone else on the march. After being threatened, with violence, by a small group of thugs, I made a complaint to one of the officers policing the event. The officer went over to the group and spoke to them, then came back and said they didn’t want me on the march. My response was of course; so what! Shortly after this a senior UAF member, who had been with the original group, came towards me snarling. It was at this point that I took my small camera out of my pocket, and took my one and only picture of that day.
Later the police told me that the suspect in the picture had been identified, and had admitted threatening me. I was also officially informed that he had been warned about his behaviour on that day.
The review goes on to cover my comments on an alleged incident in Morley, a few months ago, and asks why I make no mention of the police report in my postings. The answer is very simple; THERE WASN’T ONE! This story has all the hallmarks of another Boston Tea Party.
The last point is that people, who throw themselves in the political arena, should be prepared to be lampooned in such a way. Well yes, thinking about it again, I would accept that. But it should apply to senior UAF members, who organise public demonstrations, just as much as senior British National Party members. Ordinary citizens however, who chose to exercise their right to join a political party, should not have to put up with it (see story about Simone Clarke).
UAF should be prepared for a rough ride from here on in; they have, for too long now, had a monopoly on the blogging scene in Lancaster. This site will expose their lies and misrepresentations of the facts, but will also (in the very unlikely event of it ever happening) acknowledge any truth in the stories they publish.
They clamed I attended a Mayday march, in 2004, wearing a large rosette. this is simply a lie! I wore no badges or rosette of any kind that day, and attended the march as a member of an affiliated TUC organisation, as I had every right to do. Neither did I start taking photos of others on the march, again a Lancaster UAF lie. I took only one photograph that day, and this was after I had been recognised as a British National Party member by someone else on the march. After being threatened, with violence, by a small group of thugs, I made a complaint to one of the officers policing the event. The officer went over to the group and spoke to them, then came back and said they didn’t want me on the march. My response was of course; so what! Shortly after this a senior UAF member, who had been with the original group, came towards me snarling. It was at this point that I took my small camera out of my pocket, and took my one and only picture of that day.
Later the police told me that the suspect in the picture had been identified, and had admitted threatening me. I was also officially informed that he had been warned about his behaviour on that day.
The review goes on to cover my comments on an alleged incident in Morley, a few months ago, and asks why I make no mention of the police report in my postings. The answer is very simple; THERE WASN’T ONE! This story has all the hallmarks of another Boston Tea Party.
The last point is that people, who throw themselves in the political arena, should be prepared to be lampooned in such a way. Well yes, thinking about it again, I would accept that. But it should apply to senior UAF members, who organise public demonstrations, just as much as senior British National Party members. Ordinary citizens however, who chose to exercise their right to join a political party, should not have to put up with it (see story about Simone Clarke).
UAF should be prepared for a rough ride from here on in; they have, for too long now, had a monopoly on the blogging scene in Lancaster. This site will expose their lies and misrepresentations of the facts, but will also (in the very unlikely event of it ever happening) acknowledge any truth in the stories they publish.
Just another example of UAF’s sickening hypocrisy.
When an only mildly offensive, but not very funny, photograph of a female ballet dancer with Nick Griffin’s face pasted on it, appeared on the Lancaster UAF blog, most decent people would have thought; lets not go there, this is tending towards personal abuse.
The altered photograph appeared alongside a story about the intimidation which Simone Clarke had been subjected to after being named as a member of the British National Party, by the Guardian newspaper, a few weeks ago. Now you may feel, as I do, that the attempt to deny Simone her democratic right to belong to any political party she wishes, is not something anyone should be making light of. Obviously UAF don’t care about anyones democratic rights!
So, in an attempt to stop this before things got even more nasty, I took a photo of one of UAF’s senior members, (taken just after he had made threats of violence towards myself a few years ago) and pasted it onto another photo of a ballet dancer, most people would have thought; OK that's just tit for tat. The photo was of course not intended for publication. I emailed it to UAF, asking them politely to stop this personal abuse, and saying two can play this game, fair enough you say!
You can image my surprise when this afternoon I had a call from a police officer telling me there had been a formal complaint about the photograph. Yes they had actually had the cheek to report the email to the police. Needless to say the officer made it clear straight away, that no offence had been committed, although personally I think UAF may be guilty of wasting police time.
In fact the lady police officer turned out to be very pleasant, as are the vast majority of police officers, (at least the ones who are not after brownie points from New Labour are).
So my advice to the people at Lancaster UAF is; do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
The altered photograph appeared alongside a story about the intimidation which Simone Clarke had been subjected to after being named as a member of the British National Party, by the Guardian newspaper, a few weeks ago. Now you may feel, as I do, that the attempt to deny Simone her democratic right to belong to any political party she wishes, is not something anyone should be making light of. Obviously UAF don’t care about anyones democratic rights!
So, in an attempt to stop this before things got even more nasty, I took a photo of one of UAF’s senior members, (taken just after he had made threats of violence towards myself a few years ago) and pasted it onto another photo of a ballet dancer, most people would have thought; OK that's just tit for tat. The photo was of course not intended for publication. I emailed it to UAF, asking them politely to stop this personal abuse, and saying two can play this game, fair enough you say!
You can image my surprise when this afternoon I had a call from a police officer telling me there had been a formal complaint about the photograph. Yes they had actually had the cheek to report the email to the police. Needless to say the officer made it clear straight away, that no offence had been committed, although personally I think UAF may be guilty of wasting police time.
In fact the lady police officer turned out to be very pleasant, as are the vast majority of police officers, (at least the ones who are not after brownie points from New Labour are).
So my advice to the people at Lancaster UAF is; do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
I said it would never happen, I was wrong it just has.
Posted 9th January 2007
I said that in the unlikely event that the Lancaster UAF blog ever published an unbiased article, I would acknowledge it. Well they just have, and I do! This latest article, about a by-election in Burnley, makes no mention of the British National Party, but does tell how the by-election is due to the convictions of two Asian Lib-Dem councillor for vote rigging. OK this is no more than a cut and paste job, but it's a start.Well done Lancaster UAF, lets have more articles that are not just an attempt to twist the facts. It just might be you can teach the old fascists of UAF new tricks.
Intimidation.
Simone Clarke is a principle dancer with the English National Ballet. Last week the Guardian newspaper revealed she is also a British National Party Member. At the moment she must be going through a very tough time, and I’m sure a few emails of support would be appreciated.A short supportive email (include the word ‘support’ in the title) to Simone herself at Simoneclarke36@hotmail.co.uk and a more substantial email to the English National Ballet at info@ballet.org.uk , asking them to pass your support on to Simone.
Notice of site intentions.
Over the next few weeks this site will be expanded, to include news from the Lancaster & Morecambe area. This will include reports about the activities of the local British National Party group. Also analysis of reports published on the Lancaster UAF site.
Nick Griffin is Innocent!
.
As the yanks say 'Way to go Nick'. Stand proud, hold that torch of liberty high, and millions will follow in its light.We are not yet a defeated Nation and, if Nick is an example of the British spirit, we never will be!They tried to gag the truth, but failed. They will always fail, if good men and women stand up to be counted.
Support for the cause of free speech and the British National Party.
Older Stories
Did SWP & UAF attack their own people and blame BNP members? when an attack on UAF leafleters in Morley West Yorkshire is not reported to the Police, one has to ask why?Was the attack a re-run of the Boston Tea Party, ie. an attempt to blame the indians.
At the moment it sounds like these attackers could well have been UAF thugs masquerading as BNP members. More on this story as we get it.
.
Nick Griffin's Free Speech:
.
Innocent! Innocent! Innocent!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
1+copy.jpg){kind=link}
